The Indian Open U23 athletics 2026 results from Day 1 are now official. The Athletics Federation of India (AFI) has published the result sheet for the opening day of the 6th Indian Open U23 Athletics Competition, which began at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur on 16 October.

Eight finals were decided on Friday, and meet records fell in five events. This page therefore lists the medallists in every Day 1 final, the new meet records, the leaders from the qualifying rounds and a medal count by team. Every result below comes from the official AFI Day 1 result sheet.

Indian Open U23 Athletics Competition 2026 at a glance

8
finals on Day 1
16 October
5
meet records
in five events
40
finals
across the three days
3
days
16 to 18 October

Jump to: Highlights Meet records Men’s results Women’s results Qualifying rounds Medal count What comes next

Download the official Day 1 results (PDF)

Indian Open U23 athletics 2026 Day 1: the highlights

Records fell on the track, in the pole vault and in the discus. Rushiprasad Desai led the way in the men’s 100m, while the women’s discus produced three throws beyond the old meet record.

Rushiprasad Desai runs 10.29, then wins the 100m

Rushiprasad Desai of Maharashtra won his 100m semi-final in 10.29 seconds, with a legal tailwind of 0.7 m/s. As a result, he broke the meet record of 10.38, which Animesh Kujur of Odisha set in Patna in 2024. In the same semi-final, Abhay Singh of Madhya Pradesh equalled the old record with 10.38.

In the final, Desai ran into a headwind of 0.8 m/s. However, he still won clearly in 10.35.

Four thousandths of a second decide silver, bronze and fourth

The 100m final also produced the closest finish of the day. Savin Thingalaya of Reliance, Dondapati Mrutyam Jayaram of Odisha and Abhay Singh all clocked 10.46. The photo-finish camera then separated them: Thingalaya ran 10.451, Dondapati 10.455 and Singh 10.459.

So Thingalaya took silver and Dondapati took bronze, while Singh missed a medal by four thousandths. Dondapati was the defending champion, because he won the 100m at last year’s edition in 10.49.

Unnathi Bollanda breaks the women’s 100m record in the semi-final

Unnathi Bollanda of Reliance won the women’s 100m in 11.62, into a headwind of 0.6 m/s. That time matched the old meet record of 11.62, which Sakshi Champala set at Hanumakonda in 2025. However, Bollanda had already broken it in her semi-final, where she ran 11.55 with a tailwind of 1.2 m/s.

Kiruthika of Tamil Nadu took silver in 11.74, while V Sudheeksha of Karnataka won bronze in 11.82.

Priya wins a record-breaking discus with her last throw

The women’s discus was the best contest of the day. All three medallists threw beyond the meet record of 50.73m, which Nikita Kumari set at Hanumakonda in 2025.

First, Anisha of Delhi went past the record with 51.06m in round three, and then improved to 51.11m. Next, Nikita Kumari, now competing for Rajasthan, took the lead with 51.92m in round four. Finally, Priya of Haryana threw 53.07m with her sixth and last attempt to win gold.

Dev Meena and Kuldeep Kumar both clear 5.30m

Dev Meena of Madhya Pradesh won the men’s pole vault with 5.30m, beating his own meet record of 5.20m from Patna in 2024. He passed every height up to 5.10m, and then cleared both 5.10m and 5.30m at the first attempt.

His state teammate Kuldeep Kumar also cleared 5.30m, but needed two attempts. Therefore, Meena won on countback. Earlier this season, Kuldeep had beaten Meena on countback at 5.25m, at the Indian Athletics Series meet in Jaipur.

Ramratan of Rajasthan won bronze with 5.00m. Ashish Sharma of Uttar Pradesh also cleared 5.00m, but he needed three attempts, while Ramratan needed only one.

IOCL one-two in the 5000m, by two hundredths

Sonam Parmar won the women’s 5000m in 17:03.41, just ahead of her IOCL teammate Sunita Devi in 17:03.43. Vartika Patel of Uttar Pradesh took bronze in 17:06.78. Later the same evening, Parmar also ran the 1500m heats, where she clocked 4:37.12.

Countback decides the women’s high jump

Mahek Nasrin Dayan K of Odisha and Arpita Sarkar of West Bengal both cleared 1.69m. However, Mahek did not fail once up to that height, while Arpita needed extra attempts at 1.55m, 1.65m and 1.69m. As a result, Mahek won gold.

Three athletes cleared 1.60m. Anchal Sharma of Punjab took bronze, because she cleared it at the first attempt with no earlier failures.

Munesh and Sheeba D win the other field titles

Munesh of BSF won the women’s shot put with 14.27m in round two. Jhalak Chahal of Uttar Pradesh moved up to silver with 14.14m in her final attempt, while Khusboo of Haryana took bronze with 13.97m.

In the women’s long jump, Sheeba D of Kerala jumped 6.29m in round two to win. Munmun Chetia of Assam took silver with 6.13m, and Prathiksha Yamuna A of Tamil Nadu won bronze with 6.08m.

Meet records on Day 1 of the Indian Open U23 athletics 2026

The official result sheet marks new meet records in five events. One of them, the men’s hammer throw, fell in the qualifying round, before the final had even started.

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see the old records.

Event Athlete Team New record Old record
Men’s 100m Rushiprasad Desai Maharashtra 10.29 (semi-final) 10.38, Animesh Kujur (Odisha), Patna 2024
Women’s 100m Unnathi Bollanda Reliance 11.55 (semi-final) 11.62, Sakshi Champala (Reliance), Hanumakonda 2025
Women’s discus throw Priya Haryana 53.07m 50.73m, Nikita Kumari (NCOE Patiala), Hanumakonda 2025
Men’s pole vault Dev Meena Madhya Pradesh 5.30m 5.20m, Dev Meena (Madhya Pradesh), Patna 2024
Men’s hammer throw Nirbhay Choudhary Delhi 65.43m (qualifying) 64.75m, Nitesh Poonia (Rajasthan), Bilaspur 2022

Also inside the old marks: Abhay Singh equalled the men’s 100m record with 10.38 in the semi-finals. In addition, Nikita Kumari (51.92m) and Anisha (51.11m) both threw beyond the old discus record, while Kuldeep Kumar cleared the same 5.30m as Meena.

A note on the women’s 100m: some early reports said Bollanda only equalled the record in the final. However, the AFI result sheet marks her 11.55 semi-final as the new meet record, and that run had a legal wind of +1.2 m/s.

Men’s results: Indian Open U23 athletics 2026 Day 1

Two men’s finals were held on Day 1. Times are in seconds, while field marks are in metres.

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see silver and bronze.

Event Gold Silver Bronze
100m
wind −0.8
Rushiprasad Desai
Maharashtra · 10.35
Savin Thingalaya
Reliance · 10.46
Dondapati Mrutyam Jayaram
Odisha · 10.46
Pole vault Dev Meena
Madhya Pradesh · 5.30m
Kuldeep Kumar
Madhya Pradesh · 5.30m
Ramratan
Rajasthan · 5.00m

Women’s results: Indian Open U23 athletics 2026 Day 1

Six women’s finals were decided on Day 1, and six different teams won them.

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see silver and bronze.

Event Gold Silver Bronze
100m
wind −0.6
Unnathi Bollanda
Reliance · 11.62
Kiruthika
Tamil Nadu · 11.74
V Sudheeksha
Karnataka · 11.82
5000m Sonam Parmar
IOCL · 17:03.41
Sunita Devi
IOCL · 17:03.43
Vartika Patel
Uttar Pradesh · 17:06.78
High jump Mahek Nasrin Dayan K
Odisha · 1.69m
Arpita Sarkar
West Bengal · 1.69m
Anchal Sharma
Punjab · 1.60m
Long jump Sheeba D
Kerala · 6.29m (−0.8)
Munmun Chetia
Assam · 6.13m (−0.8)
Prathiksha Yamuna A
Tamil Nadu · 6.08m (−0.9)
Shot put Munesh
BSF · 14.27m
Jhalak Chahal
Uttar Pradesh · 14.14m
Khusboo
Haryana · 13.97m
Discus throw Priya
Haryana · 53.07m
Nikita Kumari
Rajasthan · 51.92m
Anisha
Delhi · 51.11m

Fourth to eighth in the Day 1 finals

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every place.

Event 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th
Men’s 100m Abhay Singh
Madhya Pradesh · 10.46
Ajay Khade
Maharashtra · 10.52
Yuvaraj E
Tamil Nadu · 10.59
Rohan Ghosh
West Bengal · 10.63
Vibhaskar Kumar
Bihar · 10.95
Men’s pole vault Ashish Sharma
Uttar Pradesh · 5.00m
Banti Rajesh Nath
Madhya Pradesh · 4.90m
Anshu Patel
Madhya Pradesh · 4.80m
Anand Manoj
Kerala · 4.70m
Sivadev Rajeev
Kerala · 4.60m
Women’s 100m Samriti Jamwal
Himachal Pradesh · 11.90
Sakshi Champalal
Gujarat · 11.92
Dona Dhaked
Rajasthan · 11.95
Meenakshi Kumari
Uttar Pradesh · 12.04
–
Women’s 5000m Aradhana
Karnataka · 17:12.09
Latika Talwar
Rajasthan · 17:21.88
Antima Pal
Reliance · 17:25.88
Lajo Saroj
Madhya Pradesh · 17:31.56
Aarti Pawara
Maharashtra · 17:38.13
Women’s high jump Sarika Kumawat
All India Police · 1.60m
Mohur Mukherjee
NCOE Bangalore · 1.60m
Seema Kumari
CISF · 1.55m

Madheshwari Baskara
Tamil Nadu · 1.55m

– B Sandhiya
Tamil Nadu · 1.55m
Women’s long jump Anju
Uttar Pradesh · 6.04m
Taranika Teta
Chhattisgarh · 5.99m
Deesha Ganapathy
Anju Bobby Sports · 5.88m
Abinaya Sri A
Tamil Nadu · 5.87m
Lakshanya S N
Tamil Nadu · 5.81m
Women’s shot put Bharti Saini
Haryana · 13.64m
Khushboo
Rajasthan · 13.63m
Vanshika Shekhawat
Rajasthan · 13.59m
Anshika Rourtray
Odisha · 13.33m
Chandrakala
Rajasthan · 13.13m
Women’s discus throw Palak
Haryana · 48.11m
Priyanshi Kulhar
Rajasthan · 46.44m
Neha Jaglan
Railway Sports · 46.23m
Neetu Kumari
Rajasthan · 46.03m
Madhurya
Karnataka · 43.51m

Notes: only seven athletes started the women’s 100m final. In the high jump, two athletes tied for sixth, so there is no seventh place.

Qualifying rounds and the decathlon after Day 1

Nirbhay Choudhary of Delhi produced the standout qualifying mark. He threw 65.43m in the hammer, which broke the meet record and was also the only throw past the 65.00m automatic qualifying mark. By contrast, nobody reached the automatic marks in the men’s discus (58.00m) or long jump (7.80m).

On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see the final times.

Event Best in qualifying Team Mark Final
Men’s hammer throw Nirbhay Choudhary Delhi 65.43m (meet record) 18 October, 09:30
Men’s discus throw Ujjawal Choudhary Uttar Pradesh 52.85m 17 October, 14:25
Men’s long jump Shivam Uttar Pradesh 7.41m (+0.9) 17 October, 15:55
Men’s 400m Ankul Rajasthan 46.21 (semi-final) 17 October, 10:10
Women’s 400m Pravalika Narimalla Telangana 54.70 (heats) 17 October, 10:00
Men’s 1500m Priyanshu Uttarakhand 3:48.70 (heats) 17 October, 09:30
Women’s 1500m Ruhi Bohra Delhi 4:36.71 (heats) 17 October, 09:40
Men’s 5000m Abhishek Uttar Pradesh 14:18.73 (heats) 17 October, 07:20

Final times are from the AFI competition page and may change.

Bharath Raj B leads the decathlon

Bharath Raj B of Kerala leads the decathlon with 3,773 points after five events. His best score came in the high jump, where he cleared 2.10m. Abhijit Bhosale of Air Force is second with 3,589 points, and Jayesh Rathva of Gujarat is third with 3,525. The meet record is 7,065 points, set in 2024.

Medal count by team after Day 1

AFI does not publish a team table with the daily results. So we counted the medals in the eight Day 1 finals. Eight different teams won one gold each, and 16 teams won at least one medal.

Team Gold Silver Bronze Total
Madhya Pradesh 1 1 0 2
IOCL 1 1 0 2
Reliance 1 1 0 2
Haryana 1 0 1 2
Odisha 1 0 1 2
BSF 1 0 0 1
Kerala 1 0 0 1
Maharashtra 1 0 0 1
Rajasthan 0 1 1 2
Tamil Nadu 0 1 1 2
Uttar Pradesh 0 1 1 2
Assam 0 1 0 1
West Bengal 0 1 0 1
Delhi 0 0 1 1
Karnataka 0 0 1 1
Punjab 0 0 1 1

However, this is our count and not an official standing. Since the meet is open, the table mixes states with institutional teams such as IOCL, Reliance and BSF. We will update it after Day 2 and Day 3.

Last year: the 5th edition in Hanamkonda

The 5th Indian Open U23 Athletics Competition took place in Hanamkonda, Warangal, from 16 to 18 October 2025. Dondapati Mrutyam Jayaram won the men’s 100m there in 10.49, according to World Athletics. This year, he ran faster in Jaipur, but 10.46 was only good enough for bronze.

Two of the records set in Hanamkonda lasted just one year. Sakshi Champala’s 11.62 in the women’s 100m and Nikita Kumari’s 50.73m in the discus both fell on Day 1 in Jaipur. Similarly, two records from the 2024 edition in Patna also went: Animesh Kujur’s 10.38 and Dev Meena’s 5.20m.

What comes next at the Indian Open U23 athletics 2026

Day 2 on Saturday, 17 October, has the busiest programme of finals. It includes the men’s 5000m, both 1500m and 400m finals, the men’s 110m hurdles, the women’s 100m hurdles and the women’s pole vault. In addition, the men’s discus, shot put and long jump finals, the women’s 10,000m and half marathon race walk, and the end of the decathlon are also on Day 2.

Day 3 on Sunday, 18 October, closes the meet. It has both 200m, 800m, 400m hurdles and 3000m steeplechase finals, the men’s 10,000m and half marathon race walk, the hammer, javelin and triple jump for men and women, the men’s high jump and the heptathlon. The full timetable is in the AFI competition schedule (PDF).

Meanwhile, the junior season moves to the National Junior Athletics Championships 2026 in Chennai from 23 to 27 October. Results from every other meet this season are also on the Indian athletics results page.

Download the full Day 1 results (PDF)

Read next

Indian Open U23 Athletics Competition 2026 at Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur

The Neeraj Chopra injury that ended his 2026 season is an ankle ligament tear that he suffered in training in late August 2026, shortly after his season-best 88.05m at the Lausanne Diamond League. As a result, he ended his season early and missed the Diamond League Final, the Ultimate Championship and the Asian Games.

No return date has been announced. However, Neeraj has said that he will now focus on rehabilitation and on the competitions of next year. This update covers what happened, the events he missed, what he said and what we know about his comeback.

Neeraj Chopra injury at a glance

Jump to: What happened Events missed What he said When he returns His 2026 season India without him

What happened: the Neeraj Chopra injury timeline

Neeraj had already lost the start of 2026 to injury. A lower-back problem delayed his first competition until June. After that, he built up steadily and won Commonwealth Games silver in Glasgow. For his full career record, see our Neeraj Chopra athlete profile.

When What happened
June 2026 First competition of the season, after a back injury delayed his start
July–August 2026 Silver at the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow with 85.83m, behind Rumesh Pathirage (89.75m)
21 August 2026 Season-best 88.05m for second at the Lausanne Diamond League, nine centimetres behind Pathirage
Late August 2026 Ankle ligament tear in training; season over
5 to 28 September 2026 Missed the Diamond League Final, the Ultimate Championship and the Asian Games
Neeraj Chopra at the Lausanne Diamond League 2026, shortly before his injury
Neeraj Chopra threw a season-best 88.05m in Lausanne on 21 August, shortly before the injury. Photo: Athletics India

The timing hurt most. The injury came the day after his Lausanne season best, just as he was getting back to his best form.

Events Neeraj Chopra missed because of the injury

Neeraj had three big competitions planned for September. As our preview of his September showed, each one had an elite field.

Date Competition Venue
5 September Diamond League Final Brussels
11–13 September World Athletics Ultimate Championship Budapest
28 September (javelin final) Asian Games 2026 Aichi-Nagoya, Japan

The Asian Games hurt India the most, because Neeraj was the defending champion from Hangzhou 2022. Without him, Sri Lanka’s Rumesh Pathirage won gold with 88.55m. Even so, Yashvir Singh took silver and Rohit Yadav bronze, so India still won two medals in the event. Read more on who replaced Neeraj Chopra at the Asian Games.

What Neeraj Chopra said about his injury

Neeraj announced the injury in a statement on social media. He wrote that he had finally found his momentum in Lausanne, before the ligament tear in training ended his season.

Neeraj Chopra's statement on his ankle injury and the end of his 2026 season
Neeraj Chopra’s statement on his injury: “My focus now is on recovering well and coming back even stronger.”

Later, speaking to the media on 20 September, he said the first step was to accept the injury. He admitted that the timing was hard, because he had just regained his form. He also advised young javelin throwers to be patient, since the event is prone to injuries.

When will he return to competition?

There is no confirmed return date or timeline yet. Neeraj himself has said that he will restart rehabilitation, return to training gradually and target the competitions of next year.

In short, Neeraj Chopra is not expected to compete again in 2026. We will update this page as soon as he or his team announces a return date or his first competition of 2027.

His 2026 season before the setback

Despite the late start, Neeraj was getting better with every competition. He won Commonwealth Games silver, then threw 88.05m in Lausanne. That throw lifted him into the qualifying places for the Ultimate Championship, and he had already qualified for the Diamond League Final.

88.05m
2026 season best
Lausanne, 21 August
85.83m
Commonwealth silver
Glasgow
9cm
Behind Pathirage
in Lausanne
3
Events missed
in September

Rumesh Pathirage, meanwhile, beat him in both Glasgow and Lausanne. As a result, the Sri Lankan has become the new leader of Asian javelin; you can read more in our profile of Pathirage’s rise.

Indian javelin without Neeraj Chopra

Neeraj’s injury opened the door for the next generation. Yashvir Singh threw a personal best of 85.72m for Asian Games silver, and Rohit Yadav took bronze with 84.35m. See the full Asian Games javelin results for every throw.

Read next

Neeraj Chopra injury update 2026, ankle ligament tear ends his season

Indian athletes banned for doping in 2026 include national medallists, Indian Athletics Series winners and, in a clear shift this year, high-profile coaches. The latest National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) list, dated 12 October 2026, names 14 athletes and support staff, and eight of them are from athletics.

This page brings together every major doping ban and provisional suspension in Indian athletics this year. It covers cases from NADA and the Athletics Integrity Unit (AIU), the substances involved, and what each sanction means for the athlete. Athletics India reported many of these cases first, and we update this page whenever a new list is published.

Doping in Indian athletics 2026 at a glance

Jump to: October list Coaches Earlier 2026 bans Substances Suspension vs ban After a ban Why it matters Our reporting

Latest Indian athletes banned for doping: NADA list of 12 October 2026

NADA’s provisional suspension list of 12 October 2026 is the most recent update. It includes a Federation Cup medallist, several Indian Athletics Series winners and a leading Army Sports Institute (ASI) coach. We reported the full list the following day in 8 of 14 new provisional suspensions are from athletics.

Name Event Substance / charge Status
Sakir 800m / 1500m Stanozolol Provisional suspension
Aditya Patial 800m Stanozolol, Dehydrochloromethyltestosterone, Mephentermine Provisional suspension
Mehardeep Kaur 400m Stanozolol, Metandienone, Letrozole Provisional suspension
Amit Majumdar Javelin throw Stanozolol Provisional suspension
Shiva Tomar 800m Mephentermine, Morphine Provisional suspension
Rahul Shot put Metandienone, Oxandrolone Provisional suspension
Yunus Khan (coach) Middle and long distance Article 2.9, complicity Provisional suspension

Five of the six athletes in the table tested positive for at least one anabolic steroid. Several had won finals at the Indian Athletics Series this season, so those results may now be reviewed. Sakir, for example, won 1500m silver at the 2026 Federation Cup.

Indian athletes banned for doping in 2026 on the NADA provisional suspension list of 12 October
Eight of the 14 names on NADA’s October 2026 list are from athletics. Graphic: Athletics India

Coaches suspended and banned for doping in 2026

For years, doping cases in India ended with the athlete. In 2026, however, NADA has charged several well-known coaches. This matters because one coach can influence dozens of athletes. Our analysis, how the 2026 crackdown put top coaches in NADA’s crosshairs, looks at this shift in detail.

Yunus Khan: provisional suspension for complicity

Mohammad Yunus Khan, a middle and long distance coach at the Army Sports Institute in Pune, has been charged under Article 2.9 of the NADA Anti-Doping Rules. He guided Gulveer Singh early in his career and has worked with marathoner Sawan Barwal. According to our sources, the charge is linked to training access for Kartik Kumar, who is serving a ban. Khan declined to comment. Read the full story: ASI coach Yunus Khan suspended by NADA.

Rakesh Kumar: lifetime ban

NADA handed coach Rakesh Kumar a lifetime ban for administering prohibited substances to athletes in athletics, weightlifting and powerlifting. He had been suspended since March 2025. It is one of very few lifetime bans given to a coach in Indian athletics.

Sandeep Maan: trafficking charge

Sonipat-based coach Sandeep Maan appears on NADA’s list under Article 2.7, which covers trafficking of prohibited substances. The case is linked to junior athlete Sanjana Singh, who is also on the list.

ASI coach Yunus Khan provisionally suspended by NADA in 2026 for complicity
Yunus Khan is one of the best-known distance coaches in India. Graphic: Athletics India

Other Indian athletes banned for doping earlier in 2026

The October list follows a steady run of cases since January. These are the main ones we reported, with a link to each story.

Athlete Sanction Reported
Twinkle Chaudhary (800m) 4-year ban March 2026
Sneha Kolleri (400m) 3-year ban by the AIU March 2026
Anusha Biswas 4-year ban by NADA March 2026
KM Deeksha Provisional suspension, Stanozolol June 2026
Prakruthi Roopa Rao (sprints) Provisional suspension, Stanozolol and Drostanolone 2026

The investigation around sprinter Dhanalakshmi Sekar and her coach has also continued this year. We covered it in the Dhanalakshmi Sekar doping case and the probe into coach Manikandan.

Banned substances found in Indian athletes in 2026

The same few substances appear again and again in this year’s cases. All of them are on the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) Prohibited List.

When several steroids appear in one sample, it usually points to a planned programme rather than an accidental intake, such as a contaminated supplement.

Provisional suspension vs doping ban: what is the difference?

Most names on the October list are provisionally suspended, not yet banned. A provisional suspension starts after a positive test or a formal charge, and the athlete cannot compete until the case is decided.

The case then goes to NADA’s Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel (ADDP). If the panel finds a violation, it hands down a ban, usually four years for an intentional steroid offence. Either side can then appeal to the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel (ADAP). Complicity charges, like the one against Yunus Khan, can lead to a ban of two years up to life.

Provisional suspension
Temporary. Starts after a positive test or charge. The case is still open.
Ban (period of ineligibility)
Final decision by the ADDP or ADAP. Usually 4 years for intentional doping.

For a step-by-step guide, read our explainer on the NADA process from doping allegation to final appeal. NADA publishes its official lists on the NADA India website, while international bans appear on the AIU global list of ineligible persons.

What happens after an Indian athlete is banned for doping

A ban affects more than the athlete’s next competition. Results from the date of the positive sample are usually disqualified, which means medals, prize money and records can be taken away. Rankings and team selections may also change for other athletes.

During the ban, the athlete cannot train at federation-recognised or government-funded facilities. They may only return to team training near the end of the ban, in the last two months or the last quarter of the period, whichever is shorter. This rule is at the centre of the Yunus Khan case. We also discussed a related question in should a doping ban end an athlete’s right to coach?

Why doping in Indian athletics is under global watch

India has one of the highest numbers of banned track and field athletes on the AIU’s ineligible list. The AIU also keeps India in its highest-risk group of countries. We explained what this means in India’s Category A doping risk status.

Pressure has also come from WADA. Its leadership met India’s Central Bureau of Investigation this year to discuss supply networks, as we reported in WADA chief meets CBI over India’s doping crackdown. In addition, NADA has widened its Registered Testing Pool, with 120 athletics athletes in the Q2 2026 pool, and anti-doping education is now mandatory for Asian Games athletes.

For clean athletes, every case matters. Results, national records and team places can all change after a ban, so a clear record of Indian athletes banned for doping is important for the whole sport.

How Athletics India reports doping cases

Our team checks every new NADA and AIU list as soon as it is published. We then confirm each athletics case against competition results and, where possible, contact the athlete or coach for comment. Each name on this page links to our original report.

A provisional suspension is not a final finding. We say clearly when a case is still open, and we update this page when a panel reaches a decision or a suspension is lifted. To report an error, please contact our editorial team.

Athletics India follows every anti-doping case in Indian athletics. For all our coverage, visit our Clean Sports India section.

Read next

Indian athletes banned for doping in 2026, NADA and AIU cases

Sriram Singh, an Indian middle-distance runner, faced a career-threatening respiratory illness that nearly ended his athletic journey. Declared medically unfit, he was reassessed by a dedicated sports medicine team, which identified his condition as exercise-induced asthma.

“As joggers accelerate into runners, the siren of wheezing slowly grows louder. Within minutes, exercise-induced breathing difficulties can bring an aspiring runner to an abrupt halt.”

Almost half a century ago, three men stood together to see off an athlete flying to Bangkok to represent India at the 1978 Asian Games. No media entourage, no band, no garlands, and no cheering crowd. The athlete was Sriram Singh, one of India’s finest middle-distance runners, whose sporting career had come perilously close to ending after doctors declared him medically unfit to continue competing.

“Good luck, Sriram. Go for the gold. You can do it. The whole country will pray for you.”

Those were the words we offered him. The three of us were Dr.Gopi Kottoor, a sports physician from the Indian Navy; Illyas Babbar, his renowned personal coach; and me, his regimental medical officer.

We were seeing off an athlete whose career had been threatened by a respiratory illness that had not responded adequately to the treatment he had received. Our confidence was not based on wishful thinking. It came from clinical assessment, appropriate treatment, rehabilitation and a carefully monitored return to training.

On 15 December 1978, Sriram won the men’s 800-metre gold medal at the Bangkok Asian Games in 1 minute 48.80 seconds. He also contributed to India’s silver-medal performance in the 4 × 400-metre relay.

His victory was a triumph for Indian athletics. For those of us who worked with him, it also vindicated an emerging discipline still struggling to establish its place in Indian sport: sports medicine.

When An Olympian Was Declared Unfit

Sriram Singh Shekhawat belonged to the Rajputana Rifles Regiment of the Indian Army. His dedication to running had made him one of India’s outstanding middle-distance athletes during the 1970s.

He won the 800-metre silver medal at the 1970 Asian Games in Bangkok and the gold medal at the 1974 Asian Games in Tehran. At the 1976 Montreal Olympics, he reached the 800-metre final and finished seventh in 1 minute 45.77 seconds. That performance established an Indian national record that stood for 42 years, until Jinson Johnson broke it in 2018.

Sriram had demonstrated that an Indian runner could compete with the best in the world. Yet, after Montreal, his athletic future suddenly became uncertain.

In 1977, while training at the National Institute of Sports camp in Patiala, he developed a persistent cough, breathing difficulties and chest discomfort during running. Medical investigations were undertaken, and he received conventional treatment, including antibiotics, anti-allergic medication and corticosteroids. The diagnoses included pneumonitis and bronchial asthma, but his condition did not improve sufficiently for him to resume training.

Eventually, doctors declared him medically unfit for sport and sent him away from the national camp.

For an athlete who had reached an Olympic final, this was devastating. His career, painstakingly built through years of training, was suddenly threatened by an illness that appeared to defy treatment.

The predicament of an Olympic runner who could no longer run attracted attention. But there was another way of looking at the problem. Was Sriram necessarily unfit for sport, or was the precise nature of his illness still unknown? Newspaper headlines read: “India’s ace athlete Sriram Singh felled by a lung ailment which no Indian doctor knows how to treat.”

That distinction became the starting point of his rehabilitation.

A Fresh Assessment Changes The Course Of Events

A dejected Sriram returned to his Army base at the Rajputana Rifles Regimental Centre in Delhi Cantonment and reported to me, his authorised regimental medical officer.

That was my first personal introduction to him. It was February 1978, approximately ten months before the Asian Games in Bangkok.

Despite his achievements, he was an unassuming soldier, without airs or pretensions. He remained deeply attached to running and was reluctant to accept that his athletic career had ended.

Sports medicine was a relatively young discipline in India at the time. I was particularly interested in understanding the medical problems athletes face and finding ways to return them safely to training and competition. Sriram’s case presented precisely the kind of challenge that required this approach.

We established an immediate rapport. His coach, Illyas Babbar, was brought into the discussions, and the Commandant of the Regimental Centre agreed to release Sriram from his routine military duties so that his medical management and rehabilitation could receive the necessary attention.

I discussed the case with Dr.Gopi Kottoor, who was heading the newly established Sports Medicine Centre of the Armed Forces in Delhi Cantonment. Together, we decided that Sriram deserved a fresh assessment before anyone concluded that he could no longer compete.

We arranged further investigations, drawing on facilities available at the Army Hospital, Patel Chest Institute and the Defense Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS) in Delhi.

The persistence of his symptoms, their relationship to running and his limited response to previous treatment led us to examine the possibility of exercise-induced asthma.

The critical clue was the pattern of his breathing difficulties. He could run reasonably well, but after about six to eight minutes of exercise, he developed breathlessness and chest discomfort. Running became laborious, and the symptoms could force him to stop.

Understanding this pattern required us to look beyond the symptoms in isolation. We needed to understand how his respiratory system responded to the specific demands of athletic exercise.

Recognising Exercise-Induced Asthma

 

Exercise-induced asthma, now more commonly discussed under the term exercise-induced broncho-constriction, involves narrowing of the airways during or after physical exertion. Symptoms can include coughing, wheezing, chest tightness and breathlessness.

For a middle-distance runner, these symptoms can be particularly disabling. The 800 metres demands considerable speed, endurance and sustained effort. A runner who cannot breathe comfortably during a race cannot realise his full potential, however strong his legs or determined his mind.

The challenge was to identify the mechanism behind Sriram’s symptoms and determine whether they could be controlled enough to allow high-level training.

We studied the available medical literature and sought expert guidance. Contemporary research on exercise-induced asthma, together with our clinical observations and investigations, helped us refine our understanding of the case. We also contacted Australian sports physician Kenneth Fitch, whose work included exercise-induced asthma. His views supported our assessment.

The case demonstrated the importance of combining clinical observation with appropriate investigations and specialist consultation. The objective was not to avoid medical tests, but to ensure that they answered the right questions.

An athlete’s symptoms must be interpreted in the context of the sport, training intensity, and the circumstances in which they appear.

This is where sports medicine has a distinctive role. The physician must understand both the patient’s medical condition and the physical demands of the activity the patient hopes to return to.

In Sriram’s case, identifying the exercise-related respiratory problem opened a path that had previously appeared closed.

Treatment, Training And Trust

Once the diagnosis had been established, the next challenge was treatment.

At the time, anti-doping regulations restricted athletes’ use of certain medicines prescribed for asthma. Treatment therefore required careful consideration of both medical needs and the rules in force.

We selected sodium cromoglycate, an inhaler-based medication used to manage asthma. Sriram tolerated it well, and his symptoms responded favourably.

With his breathing difficulties brought under control, we could begin the gradual process of restoring his training capacity. The medication became part of his medical management, not a substitute for training or physical conditioning.

The distinction is important. Treating an athlete’s illness is only one part of sports medicine. The other is determining how, when, and under what conditions the athlete can safely resume training.

Our guiding principle was simple: treat and train.

Sriram was fortunate to have Illyas Babbar as his coach. Babbar understood the demands of middle-distance running and the importance of maintaining an athlete’s confidence. The coach and the two doctors worked together, monitoring Sriram’s medical condition, training load, diet, and response to exercise.

Training was resumed progressively. They increased his workload based on his response rather than a rigid schedule. The medical team remained closely involved on the training ground, observing his symptoms and adjusting the program when necessary.

The rehabilitation required patience. An athlete who has been unable to train cannot simply be instructed to resume a previous workload. Fitness must be rebuilt, and confidence must return alongside physical capacity.

Over the following months, Sriram made steady progress. After about six months, he could tolerate a much more demanding training program without the breathing difficulties that had threatened his career.

Eventually, he returned to the national training camp at Patiala—the very place that had sent him away as medically unfit.

This time, he returned as a runner preparing to compete.

The transformation was not the result of a miracle cure. It came from identifying the problem, choosing appropriate treatment, respecting the athlete’s response, and combining medical supervision with his coach’s expertise.

Above all, it required a willingness to reconsider an earlier verdict.

Bangkok: The Answer On The Track

The 1978 Asian Games in Bangkok gave Sriram the chance to show what his rehabilitation had achieved. On 15 December 1978, Sriram won the men’s 800-metre gold medal at the Bangkok Asian Games in 1 minute 48.80 seconds. He also contributed to India’s silver-medal performance in the 4 × 400-metre relay.

The athlete who had struggled to breathe during training a year earlier was now preparing to race against Asia’s best. His doctors and coach could offer encouragement, but once the race began, the responsibility rested with him.

Sriram won the men’s 800 meters in 1 minute 48.80 seconds. He also contributed to India’s silver-medal performance in the 4 × 400-metre relay.

For Indian athletics, these achievements were significant. For our small team, the 800-metre gold carried a special meaning. It was the culmination of a journey from illness and uncertainty to diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and international success.

The medal belonged first and foremost to Sriram. His determination, discipline and willingness to work through a difficult period made the comeback possible. Babbar’s coaching was indispensable, and the medical intervention helped make his return to competition possible.

This was teamwork in its truest sense.

The story also illustrates why sports medicine’s value cannot be measured merely by counting injuries treated or consultations completed. Sometimes its greatest contribution is to prevent an athlete from being lost to sport unnecessarily.

A Medical Case Worth Remembering

Sriram’s case was subsequently documented in a scientific paper titled Case report: “An athlete runs through his asthma”, authored by P. S. M. Chandran and G. Kottoor, and published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine in March 1982.

The publication placed the case in the medical literature beyond the recollections of those who participated in it. It connected the athlete’s respiratory problem with the clinical assessment and management that enabled his return to high-level sport.

The case deserves to be remembered not simply because an Olympic athlete won another gold medal, but because it demonstrates an enduring principle: a medical condition does not automatically mean the end of an athletic career.

Exercise-induced asthma is one example. Athletes may also experience stress fractures, plantar fasciitis, anterior cruciate ligament injuries, exercise-related cardiac concerns, and many other conditions requiring specialised assessment.

The appropriate response is neither to dismiss the problem nor to rush the athlete back into competition. It is to establish the diagnosis, assess the risks, treat the condition and plan a safe return to sport.

Modern sports medicine has advanced considerably since the 1970s. Diagnostic methods, rehabilitation techniques, monitoring systems and knowledge of exercise physiology have all improved. Yet the sports physician’s fundamental responsibility remains unchanged: protect the athlete’s health while helping the athlete achieve the highest possible level of performance.

The doctor must know when to treat, when to investigate and when to refer. Equally, the doctor must recognise when a condition can be managed rather than assuming that participation in sport is no longer possible.

The Doctors Behind The Medals

Sriram’s story brings a larger issue into focus.

Sport is a public spectacle. Athletes who win medals rightly receive attention, as do their coaches and the sporting institutions they represent. But the contributions of physicians and other medical specialists who help athletes recover from career-threatening conditions often go unnoticed.

Consider a young athlete struggling to find a doctor with the right experience when facing a serious sports-related problem. Without appropriate guidance, valuable time may be lost, treatment may be delayed, and the athlete may be advised to abandon sport prematurely.

Sports medicine must therefore become more accessible and more visible. Athletes, parents, coaches and sporting administrators need to understand when specialist medical expertise is required.

The solution is not to create artificial divisions within an athlete’s support team. Physiotherapists, sports scientists, nutritionists, psychologists, coaches and physicians each have essential responsibilities. Their roles must complement one another, with clear professional boundaries and effective communication.

This is particularly important in anti-doping practice. Medicines routinely used to treat ordinary illnesses may be restricted under the anti-doping rules applicable to athletes. Sports physicians must understand the relevant prohibited list, therapeutic use exemption requirements and medication rules in force at the time of treatment. Protecting an athlete means protecting both health and eligibility to compete.

The larger purpose is athlete welfare, not administrative convenience.

A Welcome Change

There is reason to welcome the growing recognition of sports medicine and sports sciences in Indian sport. Including doctors, sports scientists, and recovery specialists in training camps and in Indian contingents competing at home and abroad is an encouraging development.

Equally important is giving these professionals the recognition, respect, and working conditions they need to fulfill their responsibilities.

For too long, members of the sports sciences fraternity were visible around athletes but were not always treated as integral members of the performance team. A change in that approach is welcome.

Sriram Singh’s story, from the uncertainty of 1977 to the triumph of Bangkok in 1978, reminds us why this recognition matters. Behind a successful athlete may be a coach who understands the sport, a physician who recognises the illness, a scientist who interprets the evidence, and a team willing to work together.

The athlete earns the medal. But a sporting system that values medical knowledge and respects the people who provide it gives more athletes the opportunity to reach the starting line—and sometimes to discover their careers aren’t over after all.

The Lesson For Indian Sport

Looking back, I believe Sriram Singh’s rehabilitation was an important early example of what sports medicine can do in India. It would be unwise to claim that it was definitively the first such case in the country without a comprehensive historical review. Nevertheless, it remains a particularly valuable, medically documented example of an elite athlete returning to success after a career-threatening illness.

Sriram went on to receive major national honours, including the Arjuna Award and the Padma Shri. His achievements rightly belong in India’s athletics history.

I remember the three of us standing together as Sriram prepared to leave for Bangkok. We had no way of guaranteeing a gold medal. We knew only that an athlete who had been written off had regained the ability to train and compete.

Our message to him was simple: “Go for the gold.”

He did.

Sriram Singh, Indian middle-distance runner who overcame exercise-induced asthma to win 800m gold at the 1978 Asian Games

The Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 competition takes place from 16 to 18 October at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur. The Athletics Federation of India (AFI) has published the full schedule: 40 finals over three days, including the decathlon, the heptathlon and two half marathon race walks.

This is the sixth edition of the meet for athletes in the Under 23 age group. Below, therefore, you will find the day-by-day timetable of every final, the warm-up rounds worth watching, last year’s winners and where to follow the results. In addition, we will update this page with the medal winners each evening.

Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 at a glance

Jump to: Dates and venue Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 2025 winners Why it matters Results

Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 dates and venue

The competition runs from Friday 16 to Sunday 18 October 2026 at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur. AFI announced the schedule on its official website, and it is version 1.1, dated 29 September. As AFI notes, the organisers may still change it.

Each day starts at 6:00 AM with a distance race or a race walk. Most finals, meanwhile, are in the evening session, between 2:20 PM and 6:10 PM.

3
Days
16–18 October
40
Finals
men and women
2
Combined events
decathlon, heptathlon
6 AM
Daily start
distance and walks

The Under 23 events use senior equipment: a 7.26kg shot and hammer, a 2kg discus and an 800g javelin for men, and senior hurdle heights (1.067m in the 110m hurdles). As a result, marks from Jaipur compare directly with senior performances.

Download the official schedule (PDF)

Day 1 schedule: Friday 16 October

Ten finals take place on the opening day. The 100m finals close the day, with the women at 5:20 PM and the men at 5:30 PM. Before that, the 100m and 400m heats and semi-finals fill the morning and afternoon.

Time (IST) Final
6:00 AM Men’s 10,000m
6:40 AM Women’s 10,000m
8:00 AM Women’s shot put
8:25 AM Women’s high jump
10:00 AM Women’s discus throw
12:10 PM Men’s hammer throw
2:30 PM Men’s pole vault
4:00 PM Women’s long jump
5:20 PM Women’s 100m
5:30 PM Men’s 100m

The men’s decathlon also starts on Day 1 with the 100m, long jump, shot put, high jump and 400m. In addition, the 1500m heats for men and women end the evening.

Day 2 schedule: Saturday 17 October

Day 2 is the busiest, with 13 finals. It opens with the men’s half marathon race walk at 6:00 AM. The 1500m finals follow in the late morning, and the hurdles and 400m finals come in quick succession after lunch.

Time (IST) Final
6:00 AM Men’s half marathon race walk
11:15 AM Men’s 1500m
11:25 AM Women’s 1500m
2:20 PM Men’s discus throw
2:25 PM Women’s pole vault
2:30 PM Men’s high jump
3:00 PM Women’s 100m hurdles
3:20 PM Men’s 110m hurdles
3:40 PM Women’s 400m
3:50 PM Men’s 400m
4:00 PM Men’s shot put
4:10 PM Men’s long jump
5:40 PM Men’s decathlon (last event, 1500m)

The decathlon ends with the 1500m at 5:40 PM. Meanwhile, the women’s heptathlon covers its first four events: the 100m hurdles, high jump, shot put and 200m.

Day 3 schedule: Sunday 18 October

The final day has 17 finals. Because of the field size, the men’s 5000m is run in three races and the men’s steeplechase in two. Places are decided on time across all the races.

Time (IST) Final
6:00 AM Women’s half marathon race walk
8:00 AM Men’s 5000m (Races A, B and C)
9:00 AM Women’s 5000m
11:15 AM Women’s hammer throw
2:30 PM Men’s javelin throw
2:40 PM Women’s triple jump
3:30 PM Men’s 400m hurdles
3:45 PM Women’s 400m hurdles
4:00 PM Women’s javelin throw
4:10 PM Women’s 200m
4:20 PM Men’s 200m
4:30 PM Men’s triple jump
4:40 PM Men’s 800m
4:50 PM Women’s 800m
5:00 PM Women’s heptathlon (last event, 800m)
5:20 PM Men’s 3000m steeplechase (Races A and B)
6:10 PM Women’s 3000m steeplechase

The 200m, 800m and both 400m hurdles finals all fall between 3:30 PM and 4:50 PM. Then the heptathlon ends with the 800m, and the women’s steeplechase closes the competition at 6:10 PM.

Indian Open U23 2025: last year’s winners

The 5th edition took place in Warangal, Telangana, from 16 to 18 October 2025. These are the winners of ten finals, as listed on the World Athletics results page.

Event Winner Mark
Men’s 100m Mrutyam Jayaram Dondapati 10.49
Women’s 100m Sudeshna Shivankar 11.66
Men’s 10,000m Rijwan 29:48.91
Women’s 10,000m Latika Talwar 36:47.22
Women’s 1500m Vinita Gurjar 4:31.85
Men’s pole vault Kuldeep Kumar 5.10m
Women’s high jump Seema Kumari 1.68m
Women’s long jump Mubassina Mohammed 6.36m
Women’s shot put Simranjeet Kaur 13.99m
Men’s hammer throw S. Dinesh 58.54m

Two of those champions have since moved up to the senior stage. Sudeshna Shivankar ran in India’s women’s 4x100m relay final at the Asian Games 2026 in Nagoya. Mubassina Mohammed, meanwhile, won the long jump at the National Open Athletics Championships in New Delhi this month with 6.38m.

Mubassina Mohammed, 2025 Indian Open U23 long jump champion, at the National Open Athletics Championships 2026
Mubassina Mohammed, last year’s U23 long jump champion, beat Shaili Singh by one centimetre at the National Open Athletics Championships 2026. Photo: Athletics India

Why the Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 meet matters

For many junior champions, the Under 23 years decide whether they make the jump to senior level. This meet, therefore, gives them a national final of their own, away from the senior stars. It also matters more this year, because Asia now has an Under 23 championship. At the inaugural Asian U23 Athletics Championships in Ordos, China, in July, India finished fourth with 16 medals (3 gold, 4 silver, 9 bronze).

Anand Singh at the Asian U23 Athletics Championships 2026 in Ordos, China
Anand Singh won javelin gold with 80.57m at the inaugural Asian U23 Athletics Championships in Ordos. Photo: Athletics India

Javelin thrower Anand Singh won gold in Ordos with a personal best of 80.57m. India also won the mixed and women’s 4x400m relays there. Results in Jaipur will show which young athletes can build on that.

Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 results

We will add the winners of every final to this page each evening, from 16 to 18 October. AFI also publishes the official results on its website.

After Jaipur, the junior season continues with the National Junior Athletics Championships 2026 in Chennai from 23 to 27 October. Results from the zone championships, such as the West Zone athletics 2026 results, are also on our site.

Read next

Indian Open U23 Athletics 2026 schedule: 16 to 18 October at Sawai Mansingh Stadium, Jaipur

For years, athletes in India faced most of the consequences of doping scandals. However, 2026 has marked a turning point. The National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) has shifted its focus toward structural accountability. As a result, prominent coaches and support staff now face scrutiny under strict anti-doping regulations.

The recent provisional suspension of Yunus Khan, a middle- and long-distance coach at the Army Sports Institute (ASI), has sent shockwaves through Indian athletics. Khan is a prominent name in distance coaching. He has trained elite runners, including Asian Games medallist Gulveer Singh, Kartik Kumar, and Sawan Barwal.

The Case Against Yunus Khan

Charges and Allegations

NADA provisionally suspended Yunus Khan under Article 2.9, which covers complicity in an anti-doping rule violation.

According to the allegations, Khan facilitated training access for Kartik Kumar, a distance runner serving an active NADA suspension. He allegedly provided reference letters or authorization that allowed Kumar to access official, federation-recognized training facilities.

Under anti-doping regulations, helping a suspended athlete bypass facility access restrictions may constitute complicity.

Legal Developments

The Anti-Doping Appeal Panel cleared the suspension, legally exonerating Nagapuri of the provisional charges brought against him. However, proceedings against N Ramesh remain ongoing before the Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel.

2026 Crackdown: Prominent Coaches Facing Action

Yunus Khan is not an isolated case. In 2026, NADA’s official registry reflected a broader push to enforce accountability among coaches. The following cases involve four other prominent Indian athletics coaches who have faced action under Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs).

1. Rakesh Kumar

Sanction: NADA reportedly imposed a lifetime ban on Rakesh Kumar. This case represents one of the first instances in Indian athletics history of a coach receiving a permanent ban.

Background: Kumar is reportedly based in Bihar.

Charge: NADA sanctioned him under Article 2.8. This provision covers the administration or attempted administration of prohibited substances or methods. It also addresses aiding, abetting, or covering up an anti-doping rule violation.

Legal caveat: Public disclosures from NADA provide limited details about the specific evidence and documentation in this case.

2. Ramesh Nagapuri

Sanction: Nagapuri initially faced a provisional suspension. However, the Anti-Doping Appeal Panel (ADAP) subsequently lifted it.

Background: Nagapuri is a prominent figure in Indian sprinting. He coached Dutee Chand and served as a national junior athletics coach appointed by the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) at the time of the charge.

Allegation: NADA accused him under Article 2.9, which covers complicity. The allegation concerned an incident on December 2, 2024, at the GMC Balayogi Athletics Stadium in Hyderabad. He allegedly instructed athletes to leave the stadium to evade surprise doping control. He also allegedly failed to provide contact details for athletes under his care.

Legal caveat: The Anti-Doping Appeal Panel cleared the suspension, legally exonerating Nagapuri of the provisional charges brought against him.

3. Sandeep Maan

Sanction: As of April 1, 2026, NADA’s official list recorded Sandeep Maan under Article 2.7, which covers trafficking or attempted trafficking of prohibited substances.

Background: Maan is a national-level coach from Sonipat, Haryana.

Allegation: He allegedly supplied prohibited substances to track-and-field athletes.

Case context: The investigation stems from positive drug tests involving junior athlete Sanjana. She broke national records and won gold at the National Open and South Asian levels before testing positive for multiple banned substances.

4. Mickey Menezes

Sanction: The Anti-Doping Disciplinary Panel (ADDP) imposed a four-year ban and a ₹50,000 fine on Mickey Menezes.

Background: Menezes is a high-profile athletics coach based in Mumbai.

Charge: The panel found him guilty of violations under Articles 2.8 and 2.9. The case involved administering the prohibited anabolic steroid Drostanolone by injection to his trainee, Kirti Bhoite.

Defense: Menezes maintained that his supplier had misled him. According to his defense, the supplier claimed that the injection contained no banned ingredients.

Why the 2026 Crackdown Matters

These cases highlight the growing focus on accountability beyond athletes. Coaches and support staff play an important role in training, athlete welfare, and compliance with anti-doping rules.

Consequently, allegations involving prohibited substances, trafficking, or assistance to suspended athletes can have serious professional and legal consequences. However, each case must be assessed on its own evidence and procedural outcome. A provisional suspension or allegation does not automatically establish guilt.

As anti-doping enforcement continues to evolve, greater scrutiny of coaches may become an important part of protecting fair competition in Indian athletics.

World Athletics has named 10 women for the World Athlete of the Year 2026 award, and fans can vote until midnight CEST on Saturday 17 October. The list includes four world record setters, four Ultimate Championship winners and China’s Yan Ziyi, the Asian Games javelin champion.

The nominees were announced on 6 October, together with the 10 men’s nominees. This page therefore covers every woman on the list and her 2026 season, how the vote works, how to vote and what happens next. In addition, every achievement below comes from the World Athletics announcement.

World Athlete of the Year 2026 women at a glance

Jump to: All 10 nominees Their seasons Yan Ziyi How to vote What happens next

World Athlete of the Year 2026: all 10 women nominees

A panel of eight statisticians picked the nominees: two from World Athletics and one from each of the six continental associations. As a result, the World Athlete of the Year 2026 women’s list covers sprints, hurdles, middle distance, road running, race walking and three throwing events.

Athlete Country Event 2026 highlight
Tigst Assefa Ethiopia Marathon Won Berlin in 2:11:04 (third-fastest ever) and London in a women-only world record of 2:15:41
Chase Jackson USA Shot put North American records of 21.02m and 21.14m; world indoor champion
Melissa Jefferson-Wooden USA 100m / 200m Ultimate Championship sprint double; world leads of 10.62 and 21.47
Agnes Ngetich Kenya Road / cross-country World half marathon champion in a women-only world record of 1:05:15; world cross-country champion
Marileidy Paulino Dominican Republic 400m Ultimate and Diamond League champion; unbeaten, with a world-leading 48.48
María Pérez Spain Race walk Inaugural world record of 1:30:06 for the half marathon race walk; European champion
Camryn Rogers Canada Hammer throw North American record of 81.13m; Commonwealth Games champion
Masai Russell USA 100m hurdles World record of 12.09; unbeaten season with Ultimate and Diamond League titles
Audrey Werro Switzerland 800m Ultimate, Diamond League and European champion; world lead of 1:53.70
Yan Ziyi China Javelin throw Asian and world U20 record of 71.74m; Asian Games and Diamond League champion
10
Nominees
from 8 countries
4
World records
Russell, Ngetich, Pérez, Assefa
3
USA nominees
Jackson, Jefferson-Wooden, Russell
17 Oct
Voting closes
midnight CEST

The seasons behind the World Athlete of the Year 2026 women nominees

Masai Russell (USA), 100m hurdles

Russell set a world record of 12.09 and ran nine of the ten fastest times of the season. In addition, she was unbeaten in the 100m hurdles, and she won the Ultimate Championship title in Budapest as well as the Diamond League title.

Masai Russell, a World Athlete of the Year 2026 women's nominee, at the Ultimate Championship in Budapest
Masai Russell won the 100m hurdles at the World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest. Photo: Athletics India

Melissa Jefferson-Wooden (USA), 100m and 200m

Jefferson-Wooden won a sprint double at the Ultimate Championship, taking the 100m and the 200m. Moreover, her world-leading 21.47 in the 200m put her third on the world all-time list, and she ran a world-leading 10.62 in the 100m.

Melissa Jefferson-Wooden after winning the 100m at the Ultimate Championship 2026
Melissa Jefferson-Wooden completed a sprint double at the Ultimate Championship. Photo: Athletics India

Marileidy Paulino (Dominican Republic), 400m

Paulino won the Ultimate 400m title and regained the Diamond League title. Furthermore, she was unbeaten and ran under 49 seconds in eight races, and set a world lead and Diamond League record of 48.48.

Audrey Werro (Switzerland), 800m

Werro won the Ultimate, Diamond League and European 800m titles. On top of that, she broke the Diamond League record three times, and her world-leading 1:53.70 puts her third on the world all-time list.

Tigst Assefa (Ethiopia), marathon

First, Assefa won the London Marathon in a women-only world record of 2:15:41. Later, she won the Berlin Marathon in 2:11:04, the third-fastest time in history.

Agnes Ngetich (Kenya), road and cross-country

Ngetich won the world half marathon title by 50 seconds in a women-only world record of 1:05:15. Besides that, she won the world cross-country title by 42 seconds and ran world leads for 3000m (8:08.95) and 10km (28:58).

María Pérez (Spain), race walk

Pérez set the inaugural world record for the half marathon race walk, 1:30:06. Remarkably, she did it while winning the European title by 58 seconds.

Chase Jackson (USA), shot put

First of all, Jackson improved the North American shot put record twice, to 21.02m and then 21.14m. In addition, she won the world indoor title and set a Diamond League record to regain the Diamond Trophy.

Camryn Rogers (Canada), hammer throw

Above all, Rogers improved her own North American record to 81.13m, which keeps her second on the world all-time list. In fact, she also had the five best throws in the world this year and retained her Commonwealth Games title.

Yan Ziyi: the only Asian among the World Athlete of the Year 2026 women

Yan Ziyi of China is the only Asian woman on the list. To begin with, she opened her season with 71.74m, an Asian and world U20 record that puts her second on the world all-time javelin list. Then, in Nagoya, she won the Asian Games javelin title with 70.46m, an Asian Games record, at the age of 18.

Asia, in fact, has a javelin champion on both lists. Sri Lanka’s Rumesh Tharanga Pathirage, who won the men’s javelin gold in Nagoya, is among the men’s nominees. You can read more about the Chinese athletics team at the Asian Games on our site.

How to vote for World Athlete of the Year 2026 (women and men)

The vote decides the final ranking of all ten World Athlete of the Year 2026 women nominees, from first to tenth. In total, four groups vote, and each one counts for 25% of the result:

Voting group Who is in it Share
Fans Anyone, through the World Athletics online survey 25%
Athletes Athletes who competed at World Athletics Series events in 2026 25%
Media Commentators, journalists and content creators accredited at World Athletics Series events in 2026 25%
World Athletics Family Council and commission members, meeting directors, member federation presidents, partners and staff 25%
1
Open the official survey. World Athletics runs the fan vote through an online survey, linked from its announcement.
2
Choose your favourites. Follow the steps in the survey to cast your vote.
3
Submit before the deadline. Voting closes at midnight CEST on Saturday 17 October, which is in the early hours of Sunday 18 October in India.

What happens after the World Athlete of the Year 2026 women and men vote

17 Oct
Voting closes (midnight CEST)
10–11 Nov
Three women and three men named as finalists
29 Nov
Winners announced live in Monaco

After that, the six finalists are invited to the World Athletics Awards in Monaco, where each winner is announced on stage. For comparison, last year Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone of the USA won the women’s award and Mondo Duplantis of Sweden the men’s, as World Track reported.

Read next

World Athlete of the Year 2026 women's nominees: the 10 athletes and the 17 October voting deadline

Who is Animesh Kujur? He is the 23-year-old sprinter from Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, who holds India’s 200m national record of 20.32 seconds and runs for Odisha. At the 2026 Asian Games in Nagoya, he finished fifth in the 200m final. He then helped India secure bronze in the mixed 4x100m relay.

Yet he was once preparing for life as a soldier. This page therefore traces his journey so far, from his personal records to his 2025 and 2026 seasons, race by race. It also covers his Asian Games experience in Nagoya and his journey from a football-playing childhood to becoming India’s fastest 200m runner.

Animesh Kujur at a glance

20.32
200m national record
Asian Championships, South Korea, 2025
10.14
100m best
July 2026, Wetzlar, Germany
4th
Monaco Diamond League
U23 200m, 20.55, July 2025
3rd
4X100m mixed Relay
Asian Games 2026

Jump to: Who is he 200m record Asian Games Glasgow 2026 Relay bronze 100m Season log Personal bests His story Beyond the track

Who is Animesh Kujur? The short answer

Animesh Kujur is an Indian sprinter who represents Odisha. He was born in Jashpur, Chhattisgarh, on 2 June 2003, according to World Athletics, and he runs the 100m and 200m.

In 2025 he reset the national 200m record, reset the 100m record, ran in a Diamond League and became the first Indian male sprinter to qualify for the World Championships.

Animesh Kujur holds the Indian men’s 200m national record of 20.32 seconds.

The 200m national record: 20.32 seconds

Animesh set the 200m national record of 20.32 at the Asian Athletics Championships in South Korea in 2025.

Two weeks later he ran 20.55 for fourth place in the Under-23 200m at the Monaco Diamond League, behind Australia’s Gout Gout (20.10). He was the first Indian sprinter to compete in a Diamond League meeting.

Asian Games 2026: fifth in the 200m final

Animesh entered the Games in three events: the 100m, the 200m and the mixed 4x100m relay.

In the 200m he won his heat in 21.10 on a wet track, then finished second in his semifinal in 20.81 behind Boonson, who ran an Asian Games record 20.10. In the final on Sunday 27 September, Animesh clocked 20.80 for fifth place, well short of his 20.32 best. Boonson won in 19.88, equalling the Games record.

Place Athlete Country Time
1 Puripol Boonson Thailand 19.88
2 Huang Youwen China 20.45s
3 Soshi Mizukubo China 20.56s
4 Ali Haji Bahrain 20.67s
5 Animesh Kujur India 20.80

Animesh Kujur finishes 5th in the men’s 200m final at the Asian Games 2026, clocking 20.80 seconds.

Commonwealth Games, Glasgow 2026

Animesh Kujur delivered a promising performance at the Commonwealth Games 2026 in Glasgow, competing in both the men’s 100m and 200m events. In the 200m, India’s national record holder advanced through the opening round with a time of 20.46 seconds but missed out on a place in the final after finishing sixth in his semi-final in 20.65 seconds, ranking 17th overall.

Animesh Kujur represented India in both the men’s 100m and 200m events at the Commonwealth Games 2026 in Glasgow. In the 200m, India’s national record holder clocked 20.46 seconds in the opening round before finishing sixth in his semi-final with 20.65 seconds, placing 17th overall. The experience provided valuable exposure as he continued to compete against some of the Commonwealth’s leading sprinters.

Asian Games 2026: Mixed 4x100m relay bronze

Two days after the 200m final, Animesh ran the third leg of India’s mixed 4x100m relay team. Gurindervir Singh opened, Sneha Sathyanarayana ran the second leg, and Harita Bhadra anchored. India clocked 41.06 for bronze behind China and Thailand, as we reported.

India mixed 4x100m relay team wins bronze at Asian Games 2026
India’s mixed 4x100m relay team wins bronze in a season’s best 41.06 seconds at the Asian Games 2026.

The 100m: from national record to 10.14

Animesh Kujur made history in Indian sprinting by becoming the first Indian man to break the 10.20-second barrier in the 100m. He first set the national record at 10.18 seconds in July 2025. He achieved this feat at the Dromia International Sprint and Relays Meeting in Greece. Consequently, he surpassed Gurindervir Singh’s previous national record of 10.23 seconds.

In May 2026, Animesh lowered his record to 10.15 seconds. He clocked this time in the 100m semi-final at the National Inter-State Senior Athletics Championships in Ranchi. As a result, he secured qualification for the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, according to PTI.

However, Gurindervir reclaimed the national record by clocking 10.09 seconds in the final in Ranchi, setting a new benchmark for Indian sprinting. Animesh maintained his strong international form at the Fast Arms Fast Legs meet in Wetzlar, Germany, on July 10, 2026. He clocked an impressive 10.14 seconds in the 100m. As a result, he became the second-fastest Indian man ever in the event. Moreover, he recorded the fastest 100m time by an Indian on foreign soil. Consequently, this performance highlighted his consistency and strengthened his standing on the international stage.

Animesh Kujur’s 2025 and 2026 seasons, race by race

Animesh Kujur progressed from breaking India’s 100m and 200m national records to competing consistently at major international meets. Moreover, he set the 100m national record twice in 2026. However, Gurindervir Singh later raised the benchmark to 10.09 seconds.

When Meet Event Result
31 May 2025 Asian Athletics Championships, South Korea 200m 20.32, national record
5–6 July 2025 Dromia International Sprint and Relays, Greece 100m 10.18, national record then
11 July 2025 Monaco Diamond League U23 200m 20.55, 4th
18 September 2025 World Championships Tokyo 200m, Round 1 20.77s, 9th in Heat 3; did not advance
22 May 2026 Federation Cup, Ranchi 100m semifinal 10.15, national record then
25 June 2026 Inter-State Championships, Bhubaneswar 200m 20.74s, won; achieved the Asian Games qualifying standard
July 2026 Glasgow 2026  200m 20.60s, Finished 6th in semi-final heat.
10 July 2026 Fast Arms Fast Legs, Wetzlar 100m 10.14, 2nd
24 September Asian Games, Nagoya 100m 10.38, 7th in semi-final
26 September Asian Games, Nagoya 200m heat 21.10, won
26 September Asian Games, Nagoya 200m semifinal 20.81, 2nd
27 September Asian Games final, Nagoya 200m 20.80, 5th
29 September Asian Games, Nagoya Mixed 4x100m relay 41.06, bronze

Animesh Kujur Personal Bests

Personal-best marks, dates and venues are cross-checked against Animesh Kujur’s World Athletics profile and the Athletics Federation of India athlete profile. His 100m personal best stands at 10.14 seconds. Meanwhile, his legal 200m personal best is 20.32 seconds, which is the Indian national record. His faster 20.27-second 200m performance was wind-assisted and is not recognised as a legal personal best.

Event Time Where Date
100m 10.14 Fast Arms Fast Legs, Wetzlar, Germany 10 July 2026
200m 20.32 (NR) Asian Athletics Championships, South Korea 31 May 2025
60m (indoor) 6.71s Kalinga Indoor Stadium, Bhubaneswar, India 25 March 2026

His 10.14 is the second-fastest 100m by an Indian, behind Gurindervir Singh’s 10.09. It also means he owns three of the five fastest Indian 100m times.

From Jashpur to Odisha: his story

Animesh was born in Jashpur, in the tribal heartland of Chhattisgarh. Both parents were police officers, so the family moved around. His mother played basketball at the intercollegiate level and his father played football for the state police team. Animesh and his brother Aniket started with football.

He was preparing for life as a soldier before the switch to elite sport.

He joined the Reliance Foundation programme in December 2022 and works with coach Owens. A training camp in Switzerland and movement specialist Chris Woolley helped him improve his starts, historically his weakest area.  Eastern Eye reported his Olympic ambition.

Animesh Kujur wins men’s 100m at Indian Series Final 2026

Beyond the track

Animesh Kujur grew up dreaming of becoming a footballer before switching to athletics in 2021. He idolises Jamaican sprint legend Usain Bolt and often celebrates with Bolt’s signature lightning-bolt pose. In 2025, the Odisha government honoured him with the Biju Patnaik Sports Award 2024. He received the award in the Outstanding Performance in Sports and Games category, along with ₹3 lakh in prize money.

Future plans

Animesh aims to break the 10-second barrier in the 100m and run under 20 seconds in the 200m. He also targets qualification for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Ultimately, he hopes to win a medal on the world stage.

Follow Animesh Kujur on Athletics India

His full stats and results are on Animesh Kujur’s athlete profile. Results from the national championships are on our RESULTS PAGE .

Read next

Animesh Kujur, Indian sprinter and 200m national record holder with a personal best of 20.32 seconds

According to the provided competition schedule, the 70th Punjab Schools Inter-District Athletics Championship 2025–26 will take place from October 15 to 18, 2026, at Guru Nanak Stadium in Ludhiana, Punjab. Over four days, the championship will feature Under-14 and Under-17 athletes competing across track and field events.

The programme includes sprint races, middle- and long-distance running, hurdles, race walking, relays, jumps and throwing events. Additionally, selected sprint events feature preliminary rounds and semi-finals before the finals.

Finally, the championship will conclude on October 18 with the Under-17 boys’ and girls’ 4x400m relay finals.

Event Details

Source: Competition schedule supplied for this report. Check the dates and programme against any revised notice from the organisers before publication.

Day 1: October 15 — Distance Races, Field Events and Relays

The opening day combines throwing events, distance running, jumps, hurdles and a relay final.

The programme begins at 11:00 AM with the Under-14 girls’ shot put, which uses a 3kg implement. Meanwhile, the Under-17 girls’ long jump starts at 11:10 AM, followed by the Under-17 boys’ discus throw at 11:30 AM.

On the track, the Under-17 boys’ 3,000m begins at 12:10 PM. Shortly afterward, the Under-17 girls’ race starts at 12:25 PM.

After the scheduled break, the Under-14 boys’ high jump begins at 2:10 PM. Next, the Under-17 boys’ 400m hurdles starts at 2:30 PM, followed by the girls’ race at 3:15 PM. Finally, the Under-14 girls’ 4x100m relay concludes the listed programme at 4:00 PM.

Key events on October 15

The supplied schedule marks the hurdles and relay events as final/time-trial events. Meanwhile, the schedule lists all the other events mentioned above as finals.

Day 2: October 16 — Sprint Rounds and 400m Finals

The second day features race walking, sprint preliminaries, middle-distance finals and several field-event finals. In addition, it includes the 400m finals for all four age-category and gender groups.

The morning begins at 9:30 AM with the Under-17 boys’ 5,000m race walk and the Under-14 boys’ shot put. The Under-17 girls’ discus throw follows at 9:40 AM. Meanwhile, the Under-17 boys’ long jump starts at 9:45 AM.

Next, the 100m first round begins at 10:00 AM with the Under-17 boys. The Under-17 girls compete at 10:25 AM, followed by the Under-14 boys at 10:50 AM and the Under-14 girls at 11:15 AM.

Afterward, the 400m first round begins at 11:35 AM for the Under-17 boys. The Under-17 girls follow at noon, while the Under-14 boys and girls compete at 12:25 PM and 12:50 PM, respectively.

During the afternoon session, the Under-17 boys’ 1,500m final starts at 2:00 PM, followed by the girls’ final at 2:15 PM. Additionally, the session includes field-event finals and the 100m semi-finals.

The 400m finals begin at 3:15 PM with the Under-17 boys. The Under-17 girls follow at 3:30 PM, while the Under-14 boys compete at 3:45 PM and the girls at 4:00 PM. Finally, the Under-17 boys’ 4x100m relay rounds off the listed programme at 4:20 PM.

Key events on October 16

The four 400m finals make the afternoon a key part of the second day, while the sprint rounds will determine which athletes advance to the next stage.

Day 3: October 17 — 100m Finals, Hurdles and 800m Races

The third day begins at 9:30 AM with the Under-17 girls’ 3,000m race walk. Meanwhile, the morning field-event programme includes the Under-17 girls’ shot put, Under-14 girls’ discus throw, Under-14 boys’ long jump and Under-17 girls’ high jump.

The 100m finals then follow across both age groups. First, the Under-14 boys compete at 10:00 AM, followed by the Under-14 girls at 10:10 AM. Next, the Under-17 boys’ final starts at 10:20 AM, while the girls take the track at 10:30 AM.

The programme then moves to the Under-14 boys’ 80m hurdles at 11:00 AM and the girls’ event at 11:30 AM. After these races, the Under-17 boys’ 800m final begins at 11:50 AM, followed by the girls’ final at 12:10 PM.

In the afternoon, athletes contest the first round of the 200m across all four categories. The Under-17 boys start at 2:00 PM, followed by the girls at 2:25 PM. Meanwhile, the Under-14 boys compete at 2:50 PM, and the girls begin at 3:10 PM.

Field-event finals include the Under-17 girls’ javelin throw, triple jump and hammer throw. In addition, the Under-17 boys will contest the pole vault and hammer throw finals.

The relay programme features the Under-17 girls’ 4x100m relay at 3:35 PM. Finally, the Under-14 boys’ 4x100m relay follows at 4:00 PM.

Key events on October 17

The 100m finals and 800m races headline the third day’s track programme. c

Day 4: October 18 — 200m Finals and Closing Relays

The final day features hurdles, the javelin throw, triple jump, pole vault, 200m finals, 600m races and the Under-17 4x400m relays.

The morning begins at 9:30 AM with the Under-17 girls’ 100m hurdles. Next, the Under-17 boys’ 110m hurdles starts at 10:00 AM. The Under-17 boys’ javelin throw follows at 10:10 AM, while the boys’ triple jump begins at 10:15 AM. Meanwhile, the Under-17 girls’ pole vault is scheduled for 10:20 AM.

The 200m finals then begin at 10:30 AM with the Under-17 boys. The Under-17 girls follow at 10:40 AM, while the Under-14 boys and girls compete at 10:50 AM and 11:10 AM, respectively.

Afterward, the Under-14 boys’ 600m final starts at 11:20 AM. The girls’ final follows at 11:40 AM.

Finally, the championship concludes with the Under-17 4x400m relay finals. The boys’ relay starts at noon, followed by the girls’ relay at 12:30 PM.

Key events on October 18

The two 4x400m relays close the four-day programme, according to the supplied schedule.

Events and Disciplines Across Four Days

The championship schedule covers a broad range of athletics events for Under-14 and Under-17 competitors.

Track events: 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 1,500m, 3,000m, 600m, 400m hurdles, 80m hurdles, 100m hurdles, 110m hurdles and relay races.

Race walking: 5,000m race walk for Under-17 boys and 3,000m race walk for Under-17 girls.

Jumping events: Long jump, high jump, triple jump and pole vault.

Throwing events: Shot put, discus throw, hammer throw and javelin throw.

The schedule also lists specific implement weights and hurdle heights for certain age groups and events. Therefore, athletes and team officials should review the complete competition document to confirm the relevant technical specifications.

Important Information for Athletes and Team Officials

The timetable lists scheduled start times and identifies each event as a final, preliminary round, semi-final or final/time-trial event. However, several track and field events may take place simultaneously, especially during morning sessions.

Therefore, athletes and team officials should review the complete timetable when planning their preparations. They should also check for revised schedules issued by the organisers.

The supplied document does not include a confirmed list of participating districts or athlete entries. For this reason, readers should consult the organisers’ latest notices for additional information.

Punjab Schools Athletics Championship 2026 schedule at Guru Nanak Stadium in Ludhiana from October 15 to 18

The National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) published its latest provisional suspension list on 12 October 2026. The list names 14 athletes and coaches. Eight of them come from athletics.

Sakir — Sakir won silver in the 1500m at the 2026 Federation Cup. This season, he recorded personal bests of 1:51.54 in the 800m and 3:40.83 in the 1500m. His doping test returned a positive result for Stanozolol.

Aditya Patial — Patial finished third in Final 1 of the 800m at Indian Athletics Series-5. He recorded a time of 1:57.02. NADA provisionally suspended him after his test detected three substances: Stanozolol, Dehydrochloromethyltestosterone and Mephentermine.

Mehardeep Kaur — Kaur finished fourth in the 400m at the 2026 Junior Federation Cup. Her personal best in the women’s 400m stands at 54.83 seconds. She opened her season with a win in Final 1 at Indian Open Athletics Series-2. However, her doping test detected Stanozolol, Metandienone and Letrozole.

Amit Majumdar — Majumdar is a 39-year-old javelin thrower from Bengal. NADA provisionally suspended him after his test detected Stanozolol. Meanwhile, he finished second at Indian Open Athletics Series-2, throwing 62.18m.

Shiva Tomar — Tomar won Final 2 of the 800m at Indian Athletics Series-9. However, NADA provisionally suspended him after his doping test detected Mephentermine and Morphine.

Rahul — Rahul won the shot put at Indian Athletics Series-11, held at Salt Lake Stadium in Kolkata. NADA also provisionally suspended him after his test detected Metandienone and Oxandrolone.

Yunus Khan — Khan has worked with several of India’s elite middle- and long-distance runners. These athletes include Gulveer Singh, Sawan Barwal and Kartik Kumar. NADA has provisionally suspended Khan. According to sources within the agency, he has been…

NADA suspension list 2026 names athletes and coaches in provisional anti-doping cases, including eight athletics cases