The fastest woman in India is Dutee Chand. Her 100m national record of 11.17 seconds, set at the Indian Grand Prix 4 in Patiala on 21 June 2021, still stands. In 2026, Harita Bhadra came within 0.05 seconds of it, running 11.22 at the Indian Athletics Final Series in New Delhi on 10 September.
In fact, that gap tells the bigger story of Indian women’s sprinting. Since October 2023, the men’s 100m record has fallen six times, from 10.26 to Gurindervir Singh’s 10.09. By contrast, the women’s 100m record has not moved since 2021, and the women’s 200m record dates from 2002. This page therefore explains who holds the records and who the fastest Indian women are in 2026. It also shows who is closest to breaking Dutee’s mark.
Fastest woman in India: quick facts
100m national record: 11.17, Dutee Chand, Patiala, 21 June 2021
Fastest in 2026: Harita Bhadra, 11.22, New Delhi, 10 September 2026
200m national record: 22.82, Saraswati Saha, Ludhiana, 28 August 2002
60m indoor national record: 7.28, Dutee Chand, Doha, 19 February 2016
LA 2028 Olympic entry standard (100m): 10.96, which is 0.21 seconds faster than the national record
Dutee Chand, the fastest woman in India since 2021
On 21 June 2021, Dutee Chand clocked 11.17 seconds in the women’s 100m at the Indian Grand Prix 4. The race was held at the Netaji Subhas National Institute of Sports (NSNIS), Patiala. The wind reading was 0.0 m/s, so the run had no wind assistance and was a valid, wind-legal record. It improved her own previous national record of 11.22 seconds, set in Ranchi on 11 October 2019.
However, the race also had a dramatic twist. She missed the Tokyo Olympics automatic qualification standard of 11.15 seconds by just 0.02 seconds. Moreover, the qualifying window closed on 29 June 2021, which left her very little time to try again. Earlier that day, Dutee also helped the women’s 4x100m relay team set a national record of 43.37 seconds. Her teammates were Hima Das, Archana Suseendran and Dhanalakshmi.
Her 11.17 is still the fastest 100m ever run by an Indian woman. In addition, she holds the indoor 60m record of 7.28 from Doha in 2016. At her best, Dutee won silver in both the 100m and the 200m at the 2018 Asian Games in Jakarta. A year later, she won 100m gold at the 2019 World University Games in Naples.
However, she has not raced since January 2023. She is serving a four-year doping ban that began that month. After her appeal was rejected, the ban is due to end in January 2027. For the full list of current cases, see our page on Indian athletes banned for doping.
Harita Bhadra: 0.05 seconds from the record
2026 was Harita Bhadra’s first full season on the track. The 23-year-old from Mumbai finished a sports science degree at Loughborough University in England in 2025. She then moved to full-time training with the Reliance Foundation in Navi Mumbai.
As a result, her times dropped throughout the year. She opened with a 100m best of 11.55 in Chennai and ran 11.46 at a Continental Tour meet in Bhubaneswar in August. After that, she won the Indian Athletics Final Series in New Delhi on 10 September in 11.22. Only Dutee has run faster.
Harita Bhadra celebrates 200m bronze at the Asian Games in Nagoya, weeks after running 11.22 over 100m. Photo: Athletics India
Then, a few weeks later, she won 200m bronze at the Asian Games in Nagoya in 23.20. It was the first Asian Games 200m medal for an Indian woman since Dutee’s silver in 2018. After that, she ran the anchor leg as India won mixed 4x100m relay bronze in a national record of 41.06.
7.32
60m indoor
Record: 7.28, gap 0.04
11.22
100m
Record: 11.17, gap 0.05
23.14
200m
Record: 22.82, gap 0.32
In short, Harita is within 0.32 seconds of all three national sprint records, and within 0.05 of the most famous one.
Fastest woman in India in 2026: the top sprinters
The clearest picture of the season came in one race. At the Indian Athletics Final Series in New Delhi on 10 September, four women finished under 11.40.
Before that race, Giridharani Ravikumar had led the national season list with 11.45, and Sudheshna Shivankar had run a lifetime best of 11.56. Meanwhile, Unnathi Aiyappa Bolland reached the Asian Games 200m final, where she finished sixth in 23.46.
Harita Bhadra and Unnathi Aiyappa Bolland both reached the 200m final at the 2026 Asian Games. Photo: Athletics India
Every one of these records is at least five years old, and the 200m record is 24 years old. In contrast, the men’s 100m record has changed hands three times in 2026 alone. Our full list of national records broken in 2026 shows the same pattern. Women’s records fell in the hurdles, distance events and field events, but none in the 60m, 100m or 200m.
Why the women’s 100m record has stood still
The women’s 100m record has belonged to Dutee Chand since 2021, and she has not raced since January 2023.
However, 2026 changed that. Four women ran under 11.40 in a single race, and two of them ran 11.31 or faster. That gives the event depth it has not had for years. At the same time, the world level is moving away. For example, the LA 2028 entry standard is 10.96, which is 0.21 seconds faster than India’s record. The national record is now a step on the way rather than the final target. For the world picture, see our list of the fastest women in 100m history.
Who could be the next fastest woman in India?
Harita Bhadra is the obvious candidate. She is 0.05 seconds away after only one full season, and she already runs the 200m within 0.32 of the national record. After her, Abinaya Rajarajan, at 11.31, is the next closest. Similarly, Giridharani Ravikumar and Unnathi Aiyappa Bolland, at 11.35 and 11.37, are within 0.20.
Animesh Kujur, Harita Bhadra, Abinaya Rajarajan and Gurindervir Singh after winning mixed 4x100m relay bronze in a national record of 41.06. Photo: Athletics India
Finally, Dutee’s ban is due to end in January 2027. As a result, the 2027 season could bring the record holder back on the same track as the women chasing her mark. The title of fastest woman in India could then be decided head to head.
We will update this page whenever the women’s 100m record or the 2026 top four changes.
The Sports Authority of India (SAI) has announced a major change to the coaching courses offered by the Netaji Subhas National Institute of Sports (NSNIS), Patiala. From 2027, SAI will replace the existing Six-Week Certificate Course in Sports Coaching with a Four-Week Certificate Course.
According to an official NSNIS circular dated October 23, 2026, the institute will hold the first session of the new course in May–June 2027.
The biggest change is that participants will now complete the entire course offline. Previously, candidates attended online theory classes for four weeks before completing two weeks of practical training at a designated centre. However, under the new format, they must attend all four weeks of classes and practical training in person.
What Has Changed in the New Course?
Under the old system, the institute divided the six-week course into two parts:
Four weeks of online theory classes.
Two weeks of offline practical training.
However, from 2027, NSNIS will reduce the course duration to four weeks and conduct all classes and practical sessions offline.
Physical attendance will be compulsory for every participant. In addition, the institute has ruled out both online and hybrid options.
As a result, the total course duration will decrease by two weeks. Nevertheless, candidates must attend the complete programme at their allotted training centres.
NSNIS has not yet released the new course timetable. It has also not explained how it will divide theory and practical sessions across the four weeks.
How Did the Previous Courses Work?
The previous two editions provide a clear idea of the admission and training schedule.
In 2025, the application process opened on March 20 and closed on April 14. The institute started online classes on May 6 and continued them until June 2. Candidates then appeared for the theory examination on June 6, followed by practical training from June 16 to July 2.
Similarly, in 2026, applications opened on April 1, and candidates could apply until April 22. Online classes ran from May 18 to June 15. After that, the institute conducted practical training in five different groups between June 23 and September 30.
For 2027, NSNIS has scheduled the first session for May–June. However, candidates must wait for the institute to announce the exact application and training dates.
What Were the Previous Fees and Eligibility Requirements?
Under the previous six-week course, candidates had to pay a total fee of ₹14,800.
The fee covered the following expenses:
Course fee: ₹10,000
Establishment and miscellaneous charges: ₹4,000
Library fee: ₹300
Syllabus and notes: ₹500
Additionally, candidates had to pay a non-refundable application fee of ₹1,000. Boarding and lodging charges were extra, wherever applicable.
For admission, candidates needed to pass Class 12 from a recognised board. They also had to meet the prescribed sports-achievement requirements. These included participation or achievements in district, state, university, national or international-level competitions.
However, NSNIS has not confirmed whether the new course will follow the same eligibility rules in 2027. The institute will announce the revised fees, age limit and eligibility conditions separately.
What Information Is Still Awaited?
Although NSNIS has announced the new course format and its first session, several important details remain pending.
The institute will issue a separate admission notification covering the following information:
Educational and sports eligibility.
Application opening and closing dates.
Admission and selection process.
Course fees and application charges.
Number of seats available.
Sports disciplines offered.
Training centres.
Revised curriculum and course schedule.
Candidates should therefore wait for the official admission notification before making further plans.
Is This Change Applicable to the One-Year NIS Diploma?
No. The new announcement specifically concerns the Six-Week Certificate Course in Sports Coaching.
It does not affect the regular one-year Diploma in Sports Coaching offered by NSNIS. Unlike the short certificate course, the diploma runs for two semesters and covers subjects such as sports science, coaching theory, practical training, sports psychology, biomechanics and sports nutrition.
Furthermore, the October 23 circular does not mention any changes to the one-year diploma programme.
Long before an athlete stands on an Olympic podium or steps onto a synthetic track under stadium lights, the discipline of training begins in childhood. But across track ovals, weightlifting halls, and training academies worldwide, a sinister reality has quietly taken root: millions of children are being exposed to performance-enhancing drugs before they even reach adulthood.
What was once viewed as an adult crisis of ambition and rogue science has metastasized into what anti-doping investigators describe as one of the darkest chapters in sporting history.
The Global Crisis: 10 Million Children Exposed
According to a landmark investigation published in November 2026 by the investigative unit of German broadcaster ARD, an estimated 10 million children involved in sports worldwide may have been exposed to doping.
The investigation—the culmination of six years of research across more than 50 countries and 25 sports disciplines—analyzed 44 independent studies involving young competitors. Out of an estimated 200 million children participating in competitive sports globally, anonymously surveyed young athletes revealed a staggering truth: 5% to 6% admitted to using banned, performance-enhancing substances.
Even more alarming for the track-and-field community, athletics ranks among the disciplines with the highest number of positive doping tests among minors globally, trailing closely behind weightlifting.
The betrayal often begins with trust. Investigators found that young athletes are routinely administered prohibited substances under the guise of “recovery vitamins,” protein powders, or routine dietary supplements handed out by coaches, ambitious parents, and support staff.
GLOBAL CHILD DOPING BY NUMBERS
Global Minors in Sports
~200 Million
Estimated Exposed/Doped Minors
~10 Million (5%–6%)
Investigation Scope
6 Years | 50+ Countries
Highest Risk Sports
Weightlifting & Athletics
A Historical Mirror: From State-Sponsored Abuse to Modern Exploitation
The exposure of minors to doping is not without historical precedent, though its modern form is far more decentralized and pervasive.
The East German Shadow (1970s–1980s): Under the secret state-sponsored scheme State Plan 14.25, thousands of young East German athletes—many as young as 11 or 12—were systematically fed anabolic steroids like Oral-Turinabol without their knowledge. Marketed to them as “vitamin pills,” the drugs brought international medals but left a legacy of severe organ failure, hormonal dysfunction, and lifelong psychological trauma.
WADA’s Operation Refuge (2012–2023): In January 2024, the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) released Operation Refuge, analyzing over a decade of data. Between 2012 and late 2023, WADA logged 1,518 Adverse Analytical Findings (AAFs) involving 1,416 minors. The investigation revealed widespread trauma, pressure, and abandonment experienced by child athletes who were caught and subsequently shunned by the adults who facilitated their doping.
The Indian Perspective: Ground Zero at the Grassroots
India’s athletic pipeline has made tremendous strides on the international stage, but its grassroots system faces a deep-rooted anti-doping crisis.
According to official data from the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) of India, 42 minor athletes were listed under sanctioned or provisionally suspended categories between December 26, 2023, and September 8, 2026.
As seen globally, Weightlifting and Athletics account for the overwhelming majority of minor anti-doping rule violations (ADRVs) in India:
Minors Sanctioned & Provisionally Suspended in India
(NADA Records: Dec 2023 – Sept 2026)
Sport
Sanctioned Minors
Provisionally Suspended Minors
Total Cases
Weightlifting
10
3
13
Athletics
9
0
9
Total (Top Sports)
19
3
22
What Are Indian Minors Testing Positive For?
The substances detected in Indian youth athletes range from heavy anabolic steroids to dangerous stimulants and masking agents:
Drostanolone: An anabolic-androgenic steroid heavily used for muscle density and strength without weight gain. Detected in five minor entries across weightlifting, wrestling, Wushu, and provisional lists.
Mephentermine: A potent cardiac stimulant often misused to push past physiological fatigue during high-intensity training or competition. Detected in three sanctioned entries (athletics and boxing) and a provisional wrestling case.
Norandrosterone: A primary metabolite of the anabolic steroid Nandrolone. Found in minor cases across athletics, judo, kabaddi, and wrestling.
Furosemide: A powerful loop diuretic used as a rapid weight-cutting agent or masking agent to flush out other banned substances. Detected in minor boxing and wrestling cases.
Metandienone (Dianabol): One of the oldest and most potent oral anabolic steroids, detected across weightlifting and wrestling minor entries.
The Pressure on Young Athletes
In track and field, milliseconds and centimeters can decide careers. Therefore, teenage athletes face immense pressure to gain a competitive edge, whether through national camp selections, sports quota jobs or podium finishes at junior meets.
However, when coaches or unscrupulous handlers give a 15-year-old sprinter a pill and call it a “recovery booster,” they do more than violate anti-doping rules. They exploit a child.
The qualification system for athletics at the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games, scheduled for 15 to 30 July 2028, is now available.
The athletics programme will feature 23 events each for men and women. In addition, athletes will compete in two mixed events: the mixed 4x100m relay, which will make its Olympic debut, and the mixed 4x400m relay.
As in recent major outdoor championships, World Athletics will use a dual qualification pathway. Under this model, entry standards will account for 40% of the expected qualifiers, while World Athletics rankings will determine the remaining 60%. Therefore, the new system replaces the previous 50-50 model.
However, achieving the entry standard does not guarantee an Olympic quota place. If more athletes achieve the standard than the available quota allows, World Athletics will award places to the best performers during the qualification period, within the event quota. In that case, no athletes will qualify through world rankings.
Qualification Periods
The qualification and ranking periods will differ depending on the event. The schedule is as follows:
Marathon: 1 November 2026 to 30 April 2028.
10,000m, combined events, race walks and relays: 19 December 2026 to 18 June 2028.
All other events: 19 June 2027 to 18 June 2028.
Furthermore, World Athletics will count results from competitions whose final day falls within the relevant qualification period.
Results from national senior outdoor championships will also count if the competitions begin within the applicable qualification period. However, athletes must achieve their performances no later than Thursday, 22 June.
Entry Standards
The following table lists the LA28 Olympic athletics entry standards for men and women:
Men’s Event
Men
Women’s Event
Women
100m
9.93
100m
10.96
200m
19.95
200m
22.25
400m
44.40
400m
49.90
800m
1:43.00
800m
1:57.00
1500m
3:30.00
1500m
3:57.50
5000m
12:50.00
5000m
14:34.00
10,000m
26:48.00
10,000m
30:30.00
110m hurdles
13.18
100m hurdles
12.58
400m hurdles
48.00
400m hurdles
54.00
3000m steeplechase
8:07.50
3000m steeplechase
9:06.00
High jump
2.32m
High jump
1.97m
Pole vault
5.90m
Pole vault
4.80m
Long jump
8.30m
Long jump
6.90m
Triple jump
17.35m
Triple jump
14.50m
Shot put
21.50m
Shot put
19.30m
Discus throw
67.20m
Discus throw
65.00m
Hammer throw
78.50m
Hammer throw
74.00m
Javelin throw
85.50m
Javelin throw
63.80m
Decathlon
8650 points
Heptathlon
6550 points
Half marathon race walk
WRWTC
Half marathon race walk
WRWTC
Marathon
2:05:00
Marathon
2:22:20
How Did World Athletics Decide the Entry Standards?
World Athletics calculated the top lists using the start and end dates of the four qualification periods. The calculations considered a maximum of three athletes per country.
Meanwhile, the governing body analysed performance trends, existing competition levels and expected improvements to determine the entry standards. It also considered events where athletes could significantly improve their performances compared to previous championships.
The marathon is one such event. According to performance trends, marathon times during an Olympic year are typically 30 to 60 seconds faster than projected trends.
Relay Qualification
For the relay events, the top 14 National Olympic Committees (NOCs) at the World Athletics Relays will automatically qualify for LA28. The competition will take place in The Bahamas on 22–23 April 2028.
Moreover, teams will get two opportunities to secure qualification at the World Relays. If a team fails to qualify on the first day, it can try again on the second day.
Finally, World Athletics will allocate the remaining relay places based on the World Athletics relay performance lists during the qualification period.
The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has officially begun the process for its 2026 Executive Council elections, and the political twists characteristic of Indian sports administration are already unfolding.
The biggest shock came when current IOA President P.T. Usha failed to secure a place in the women’s category of the Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) elections.
The SOM Election Results
The four elected women candidates are:
Anju Bobby George – 53 votes
Rani Rampal – 50 votes
Dola Banerjee – 45 votes
Saina Nehwal – 43 votes
P.T. Usha received only 40 out of 80 votes, finishing fifth and missing out on election.
Usha’s Pre-Poll Complaint Against Dola Banerjee
A day before the election, P.T. Usha filed a formal complaint with the Electoral Officer alleging violations of the Model Code of Conduct.
Usha objected to a WhatsApp message circulated through an account bearing former archer Dola Banerjee’s name. The message promoted the ‘New Bharat Panel’ and explicitly asked voters to elect four named candidates, providing their ballot serial numbers and roll numbers.
Model code violations cited: Usha argued that the message violated Clause 1.9 (prohibiting publicity or vote solicitation via new media/social networks) as well as Clauses 1.2 and 1.3, which mandate fair play, dignity, and moderation in campaigning.
Post-Election Fallout: Allegations of Fraud
Following her defeat, Usha alleged that the voting process was fraudulent and appealed directly to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) for intervention.
In a special report in The Tribune, Usha claimed a “big fraud” was orchestrated to remove her from leadership:
“Winning and losing is normal, but results have to be fair. I am certain that this result is fraudulent. I cannot finish fifth; I should be at the top. I know that I polled over 25 single-preference votes… Mathematically, it is impossible for her (Anju) to get 53 votes!”
Usha’s complaints also questioned:
Returning Officer Sanjay Kumar Srivastava: Alleging a failure to act on at least four separate complaints regarding Model Code violations.
Executive Members: Naming Bhupinder Singh Bajwa and Yogeshwar Dutt for improper vote solicitation.
Badminton Association of India (BAI): Accusing BAI Secretary Sanjay Mishra of forcing voters to verify their ballots using email acknowledgements.
Can the AFI Provide Another Route?
Even after losing the SOM election, Usha had a potential fallback path to the IOA General Assembly via an affiliated National Sports Federation (NSF)—specifically, the Athletics Federation of India (AFI).
Under current guidelines, 30 eligible NSFs are entitled to two representatives each (one male, one female). However, sources within the AFI indicate the federation is unlikely to nominate her, which could effectively close her final route back into the General Assembly.
As of now, the Sports Ministry, Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), and IOC have yet to issue official statements on Usha’s allegations.
The Asian Athletics Championships began in 1973 in the Philippines. Since then, the competition has grown into one of Asia’s most important senior athletics events, bringing together national teams from across the continent.
South Korea hosted the previous edition in Gumi, while Xiamen, China, will host the next edition in 2027.
At the last edition, India finished second in the overall medal standings with an impressive haul of 24 medals: 8 gold, 10 silver and 6 bronze.
The continental championships also hold particular importance as organisers traditionally schedule them ahead of the World Athletics Championships. Consequently, the event gives athletes a valuable opportunity to achieve qualifying standards and secure places at the global competition.
Meanwhile, NNIS Sports has learnt through multiple sources that Tamil Nadu is emerging as a front-runner to secure the hosting rights for the 2029 edition.
India has previously hosted the championships three times, with the last two editions taking place in Pune, Maharashtra, in 2013 and Bhubaneswar, Odisha, in 2017.
At the 2013 edition in Pune, India won 17 medals, comprising 2 gold, 6 silver and 9 bronze. However, the 2017 edition in Bhubaneswar marked India’s most successful campaign in the competition’s history. The hosts claimed 29 medals — 12 gold, 5 silver and 12 bronze — and topped the Asian Athletics Championships medal table for the first time.
What Can Tamil Nadu Bring to the Table?
Tamil Nadu has established itself as one of India’s leading athletics states in recent years. The state has produced several prominent athletes, including triple jumper Praveen Chithravel and 400m hurdler Vithya Ramraj.
Furthermore, Tamil Nadu’s strength is evident from its performances at national competitions. The state won the National Inter-State Senior Athletics Championships in both 2025 and 2026, highlighting its growing dominance.
The state’s emerging talent also impressed at the 2026 National Junior Athletics Championships. Neil Samraj broke the national records in both the men’s U18 100m and 200m. Meanwhile, Abinaya Rajarajan bettered her previous national record in the women’s U20 100m. Mrithika also recorded a personal best to win the women’s U18 100m title. All three athletes represent Tamil Nadu.
These performances highlight the state’s growing athletics ecosystem. They also reflect the depth of talent emerging through its grassroots and junior programmes.
The 2029 Asian Athletics Championships could also prove particularly significant for India, as the country has secured the hosting rights for the 2030 Commonwealth Games.
Therefore, hosting a major continental outdoor athletics competition would give India valuable experience in organising an international championship. It would also provide an important opportunity to strengthen the country’s preparations for the Commonwealth Games.
The Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has officially begun the process for its 2026 Executive Council elections. The biggest development so far is the conclusion of the Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) elections.
Let’s understand the complete election process, the voting structure and who can contest for the top positions.
THE THREE STAGES OF THE ELECTION
1. Athletes’ Commission Election
A total of 10 members: five men and five women – were elected to the Athletes’ Commission.
P.V. Sindhu and Harmanpreet Singh were elected Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson, respectively.
Meanwhile, Mirabai Chanu and Sajan Prakash were elected as the Athletes’ Commission representatives to the IOA General Assembly.
2. Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) Election
In a major development, India’s current IOA President, P.T. Usha, failed to secure a place in the women’s category of the Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) elections.
The four elected women are:
Anju Bobby George – 53 votes
Rani Rampal – 50 votes
Dola Banerjee – 45 votes
Saina Nehwal – 43 votes
In the men’s category, Gagan Narang, Kamlesh Navinchandra Mehta, Yogeshwar Dutt and Vijender Singh had already been elected unopposed.
3. Executive Council Election – 5 December
This is the most important stage of the process, as the IOA President, other office-bearers and Executive Council members will be elected on 5 December.
But before understanding who will vote, let’s first look at the positions up for election.
WHO WILL BE ELECTED ON 5 DECEMBER?
A total of 13 positions will be filled through the General Assembly election:
President – 1
Senior Vice-President – 1
Vice-Presidents – 2
Treasurer – 1
Joint Secretaries – 2
SOM representatives on the Executive Council – 2
Other Executive Council members – 4
In addition, two athlete representatives, P.V. Sindhu and Harmanpreet Singh, have already been elected through the Athletes’ Commission process.
WHO WILL HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE?
The biggest share of votes will come from the National Sports Federations (NSFs). Each eligible federation will have two representatives, with one vote each.
According to the latest notification issued by the Office of the Electoral Officer, 30 National Sports Federations are eligible to participate in the election. This means the federations will collectively account for 60 votes.
A. 30 National Sports Federations – 60 Votes
The eligible federations are:
All India Football Federation
All India Tennis Association
Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India
Archery Association of India
Athletics Federation of India
Badminton Association of India
Basketball Federation of India
Bowling Federation of India
Cycling Federation of India
Fencing Association of India
Gymnastic Federation of India
Handball Federation of India
Hockey India
Ice Hockey Association of India
Ice Skating Association of India
Indian Kayaking & Canoeing Association
Indian Rugby Football Union
Indian Triathlon Federation
Indian Weightlifting Federation
Judo Federation of India
Luge Federation of India
Modern Pentathlon Federation of India
National Rifle Association of India
Netball Federation of India
Rowing Federation of India
Ski and Snowboard India
Swimming Federation of India
The Squash Rackets Federation of India
Wrestling Federation of India
Wushu Association of India
B. Athletes’ Commission Representatives – 2 Votes
The Athletes’ Commission election has already been completed.
The two elected representatives to the General Assembly are Mirabai Chanu and Sajan Prakash. Each will have one vote.
C. IOC Member – 1 Vote
India’s International Olympic Committee (IOC) member, Nita Ambani, will have one vote.
D. SOM Representatives – 8 Votes
The eight elected Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) representatives — four men and four women — will each have one vote.
TOTAL ELECTORAL COLLEGE: 71 VOTES
Based on the above calculation, the expected electoral college will comprise 71 voters:
National Sports Federations: 60 votes
Athletes’ Commission representatives: 2 votes
IOC member: 1 vote
SOM representatives: 8 votes
Total: 71 votes
One important point to remember: Each member of the electoral college can vote separately for the different positions. In other words, voters will not be restricted to selecting the same group of candidates for every post.
WHO CAN CONTEST FOR THE IOA PRESIDENT’S POST?
The final question is: Who is eligible to contest for the post of IOA President?
A candidate must fulfil at least one of the following eligibility criteria:
Be a Sportsperson of Outstanding Merit (SOM); or
Have previously served at least one full term as a member of the IOA Executive Council; or
Have served as President, Secretary General/General Secretary or Treasurer of an affiliated unit, subject to the applicable constitutional provisions.
With the SOM elections concluded and the Executive Council elections scheduled for 5 December, the race for the top positions in the Indian Olympic Association is now taking shape.
Running fast is not enough to get to the Olympics. An athlete also has to run fast at the right meet, inside the right window, and rank high enough against the rest of the world. Qualification for global championships has changed a lot in recent years, and it is about to get even harder.
This guide explains how athletics qualification works for the three competitions that matter most to Indian athletes: the Olympic Games, the World Athletics Championships and the Asian Games. It covers entry standards, World Rankings, qualification windows and quotas, the confirmed standards for the 2027 World Championships in Beijing, what is known so far about LA 2028, and how AFI selected India’s team for the 2026 Asian Games.
Athletes qualify for global championships through entry standards or World Rankings.
Athletics qualification at a glance
Two main routes to the Olympics and World Championships: hit the entry standard, or rank high enough in the World Rankings.
Maximum three athletes per country per individual event at both.
Beijing 2027: about 40% of places by standard and 60% by ranking, with tougher standards than ever (men’s 100m: 9.95).
LA 2028: 1,810 athletes in total; most event standards are still to be published.
Asian Games: no world standards. Each country picks its own team; AFI set Indian standards close to sixth place at the previous Games.
The two routes: entry standards and World Rankings
For the Olympics and the World Championships, World Athletics sets a target number of athletes for each event: for example, 48 in the 100m and 36 in each field event at Beijing 2027. Those places are filled in two main ways:
Entry standard: a very tough mark that guarantees a place if you achieve it at an eligible competition inside the qualification window.
World Rankings: the remaining places go to the highest-ranked athletes who have not already qualified, when the ranking period closes.
Other routes: depending on the championship, wild cards for title holders, places for area (continental) champions, and top finishes at the biggest road races.
Either way, each country can send at most three athletes per individual event. If four Indians hit the standard, only three can go, and the national federation decides which three.
The balance between the two routes is shifting towards the rankings. Paris 2024 used roughly a 50/50 split. For Beijing 2027, World Athletics expects about 40% of athletes to qualify by standard and 60% by ranking.
How the World Athletics Rankings work
Because most places now come through the rankings, understanding them matters as much as running fast. Each result earns a performance score with two parts:
Performance score = result score + placing score
Result score: your mark converted to points using the World Athletics scoring tables, adjusted for wind and other conditions.
Placing score: extra points for where you finished, depending on how important the meet is.
Your ranking score is the average of your best performance scores over a set period. According to USA Track & Field’s explainer, that is:
Most events: best 5 results in 12 months
3000m steeplechase and 5000m: best 3 in 12 months
10,000m, combined events and marathon: best 2 in 18 months
Competitions are graded into categories, from OW (Olympic Games and World Championships) at the top, through the Diamond League (DF and GW) and Gold-level meets (GL), down to A to F. The higher the category, the more placing points: an Olympic win is worth 260 placing points, while winning a small local meet may be worth about 11. That is why where you compete matters almost as much as how fast you run.
How Olympic athletics qualification works
The template: Paris 2024
The Paris 2024 system shows how Olympic qualification is built:
Quota: 1,810 athletes, 905 men and 905 women.
Split: about half by entry standard and half by World Ranking.
Windows: 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024 for most events; from 31 December 2022 for the 10,000m, combined events, race walks and relays; and 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2024 for the marathon.
Relays: the top 14 teams at the 2024 World Relays qualified automatically, with the rest picked from the relay performance list.
Universality places: a country with no qualified man or woman could enter its best-ranked athlete in the 100m, 800m or marathon.
LA 2028: what we know so far
Quota: the athletics quota stays at 1,810, with a new mixed 4x100m relay added.
Marathon: the qualification window opens on 1 November 2026 and closes on 30 April 2028. The target field is 70 per race, down from 80 in Paris, with about 40% qualifying by standard or a top-five finish at a Platinum Label marathon and 60% by ranking.
Race walks: the half-marathon race walk replaces the 20km walk.
Note: as of late October 2026, the LA 2028 entry standards had not been published. Marathon Handbook reports they are expected in December 2026, after approval by the World Athletics Council. The LA 2028 details above come mainly from Marathon Handbook’s reporting, so treat them as provisional until World Athletics publishes the full system.
How World Championships qualification works: Beijing 2027
The World Athletics Council approved the qualification system for the 2027 World Championships in Beijing (11 to 19 September 2027) in May 2026. It is the toughest yet.
Qualification windows
Marathon: 3 November 2025 to 2 May 2027
10,000m, race walks, combined events and relays: 23 February 2026 to 22 August 2027
All other events: 23 August 2026 to 22 August 2027
Other routes in
Wild cards: for the 2025 world champions, winners of the 2026 World Athletics Ultimate Championship, winners of the 2026 race walking and combined events tours, leading hammer throwers on the 2026 Continental Tour, and 2027 Diamond League winners.
Area champions: continental champions qualify, unless another athlete from their area has already qualified in that event.
Relays: the top 12 teams at the 2026 World Relays in Gaborone have already qualified, and four more come from the performance lists.
Eligible meets: marks for the entry standard must mainly come from Category C competitions or higher. Lower-level meets still count for the rankings.
Beijing 2027 entry standards
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Event
Men
Women
Field size
100m
9.95
10.96
48
200m
20.07
22.45
48
400m
44.45
50.00
48
800m
1:43.00
1:57.50
56
1500m
3:30.00
3:58.00
56
5000m
12:50.00
14:36.00
42
10,000m
26:48.00
30:40.00
27
Marathon
2:06:00
2:23:20
100
3000m steeplechase
8:08.00
9:06.50
36
110m / 100m hurdles
13.18
12.60
40
400m hurdles
48.00
54.00
40
High jump
2.30m
1.96m
36
Pole vault
5.90m
4.75m
36
Long jump
8.25m
6.86m
36
Triple jump
17.35m
14.40m
36
Shot put
21.50m
19.30m
36
Discus throw
67.20m
64.50m
36
Hammer throw
78.30m
74.00m
36
Javelin throw
85.50m
63.40m
36
Decathlon / heptathlon
8,620 pts
6,550 pts
24
Half marathon race walk
1:23:00
1:33:10
50
Marathon race walk
3:01:00
3:28:00
50
Relays (all four)
Top 12 at World Relays 2026, plus 4 from performance lists
16 teams
To put these in context: Gurindervir Singh’s Indian 100m record is 10.09, Vishal TK’s 400m record is 44.98, and Tejaswin Shankar’s decathlon record is 8,057. All of them are short of the Beijing standards, so Indian athletes in most events will need the rankings route. See all Indian national records from 2026.
How Asian Games qualification works
The Asian Games work differently. There are no World Athletics entry standards or rankings. Each country’s Olympic committee enters its own team, within the limits set by the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA). In India, the Athletics Federation of India (AFI) sets its own qualifying marks and picks the team, which the government then approves.
How AFI selected India’s team for 2026
Standards near sixth place: AFI announced its standards in January 2026, based on results at the previous Asian Games. They sat close to a top-six finish at the 2023 Hangzhou Games, not a bronze-medal mark.
One selection trial: AFI’s May 2026 guidelines named the National Inter-State Senior Championships in Bhubaneswar (24 to 28 June 2026) as the only selection trial. The selection committee could exempt athletes in exceptional cases, such as those competing in the Diamond League, but only with written permission given in advance.
One per event as standard: ordinarily one athlete who meets the standard was picked per event, with the selection committee free to pick more.
Relays from AFI centres: relay teams were picked only from athletes at AFI-recognised national camps.
Other conditions: athletes had to declare their whereabouts, report any injury at once, follow the No Needle Policy, and, for women, submit an SRY gene test from an AFI-approved laboratory.
AFI qualifying standards for the 2026 Asian Games
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Event
Men
Women
100m
10.16
11.54
200m
20.88
23.70
400m
45.97
53.72
800m
1:48.80
2:05.21
1500m
3:42.00
4:19.45
5000m
13:39.18
15:36.58
10,000m
29:00.00
33:50.00
110m / 100m hurdles
13.63
13.34
400m hurdles
49.41
57.21
High jump
2.19m
1.80m
Pole vault
5.45m
4.10m
Long jump
7.91m
6.48m
Triple jump
16.28m
13.34m
Shot put
19.41m
16.25m
Discus throw
60.13m
55.48m
Hammer throw
69.12m
61.72m
Javelin throw
77.87m
57.62m
Decathlon / heptathlon
7,250 pts
5,605 pts
Marathon
2:15:04
2:31:52
4x100m relay
38.81
45.24
4x400m relay
3:04.23
3:31.23
Mixed 4x400m relay
3:26.81
Standards as announced in January 2026 and reported by The Bridge. Race walk and mixed 4x100m standards were to be decided later.
Olympics vs Worlds vs Asian Games: qualification compared
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Olympics
World Championships
Asian Games
Who sets the rules
World Athletics and IOC
World Athletics
OCA limits; each country picks its team
Routes
Standard, ranking, universality
Standard, ranking, wild card, area champion
National trials and standards (AFI for India)
Standards vs rankings
About 50/50 in Paris 2024
About 40/60 for Beijing 2027
Not used
Max per country per event
3
3 (4 with a wild card)
Set by OCA; see note
Relays
Top 14 at World Relays (Paris 2024) plus lists
Top 12 at World Relays plus 4 from lists
Chosen by the national federation
Note: we could not confirm the OCA’s per-event entry limit for athletics at the 2026 Asian Games from an official document. Reports referred to two places per event for India in some disciplines, such as the men’s javelin.
What tougher qualification means for Indian athletes
The move towards rankings, and the rule that entry standards must come from Category C meets or higher, will hit Indian athletes harder than most. Many have qualified in the past with marks from domestic meets such as the Federation Cup and the Inter-State Championships. Under the new rules, they will need:
More international competition: higher-category meets abroad earn more placing points.
Better domestic meets: Indian meets need World Athletics categories high enough to count.
Planning: athletes need a full season of strong results, not one fast day, to rank inside the field.
Stars like Neeraj Chopra will qualify either way. The bigger question is whether India can keep sending large teams to global championships.
Fact check: how we verified this guide
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Claim
Status
Sources
Beijing 2027 standards, field sizes, entry limits
Verified
World Athletics qualification document; Citius Mag; India Sports Hub
Every January, Mumbai gives its roads to runners. Tens of thousands of people set off from outside Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus, run along Marine Drive and across the Bandra–Worli Sea Link, and turn a working city into a running festival. Since 2004, the Mumbai Marathon has grown into India’s biggest road race and the event that started the country’s running boom.
This is the history of the Mumbai Marathon: how it began, how it grew from about 22,000 runners to more than 69,000, the champions and course records, the Indian runners who made their names on its streets, and its role as India’s biggest charity platform. Every fact has been checked against at least two sources where possible, and the fact-check table at the end shows the status of each claim.
The Bandra–Worli Sea Link is one of the landmarks of the Mumbai Marathon course.
Mumbai Marathon at a glance
First held: 2004, as the Standard Chartered Mumbai Marathon
Organiser: Procam International
Title sponsor: Standard Chartered (2004 to 2017), Tata Group (since 2018)
The Mumbai Marathon was created by Procam International, a Mumbai sports management company run by Anil and Vivek Singh. Inspired by the London Marathon, Procam believed Mumbai could support a big-city road race of the same kind. Its founding idea was simple: every great city in the world must have a marathon.
The first edition was held in 2004 as the Standard Chartered Mumbai Marathon, with about 22,000 participants. It raised around ₹1.44 crore for charity in its first year. South Africa’s Hendrick Ramaala won the first men’s race in 2:15:47, and Poland’s Wioletta Uryga won the women’s race in 2:47:53.
Mumbai Marathon timeline: the key moments
2004: The first Standard Chartered Mumbai Marathon, with about 22,000 participants.
2009 and 2010: The race earned an IAAF (now World Athletics) Silver Label in 2009 and a Gold Label in 2010.
2012: Ram Singh Yadav ran 2:16:59 in Mumbai to qualify for the London Olympics.
2013: The Gold Label was withdrawn. The same year, Kenya’s Valentine Kipketer ran 2:24:33, at the time the fastest women’s marathon ever run in India.
2017: Standard Chartered’s 14th and last year as title sponsor, with about 42,000 runners.
2018: The race became the Tata Mumbai Marathon under a 10-year sponsorship deal with Tata Group and Tata Consultancy Services. It regained a Silver Label.
2019: The race returned to Gold Label status.
2021 and 2022: No race was held, because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2023: Ethiopia’s Hayle Lemi (2:07:32) and Anchialem Haymanot (2:24:15) set the current course records.
2024: A record ₹72 crore was raised for charity by 268 NGOs.
2026: The 21st edition drew about 70,000 participants, the biggest field in the race’s history.
2027: The 22nd edition is scheduled for 17 January 2027.
The Mumbai Marathon course
The marathon starts opposite Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CSMT), the UNESCO-listed railway station in south Mumbai. It runs past Flora Fountain, along Marine Drive and Chowpatty, past Haji Ali and Mahim Church, and over the Bandra–Worli Sea Link, before turning back into the city.
Runners say the hardest stretch is Peddar Road, a long climb late in the race. The humidity of a Mumbai morning also makes fast times hard to run. That is why the course records, while quick, are slower than those of the flat, cool marathons of Europe and Asia.
The event also includes a half marathon, a 10K, the Dream Run, a Senior Citizens’ Run and a race for Champions with Disability.
Mumbai Marathon course records
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Category
Athlete
Time
Year
Men
Hayle Lemi (Ethiopia)
2:07:32
2023
Women
Anchialem Haymanot (Ethiopia)
2:24:15
2023
Haymanot’s record broke Valentine Kipketer’s 2:24:33, which had stood since 2013. Hayle Lemi came back to win again in 2024 in 2:07:50, making him one of only two men to win the race twice, along with Kenya’s John Kelai (2007 and 2008).
Every Mumbai Marathon winner (2004 to 2026)
East Africa has dominated the elite races. Ethiopia leads with 23 titles (7 men’s and 16 women’s), and Kenya has 13 (10 men’s and 3 women’s). Ethiopia’s Mulu Seboka is the most successful runner in the race’s history, with three women’s titles.
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Year
Men’s winner
Women’s winner
2004
Hendrick Ramaala (RSA), 2:15:47
Wioletta Uryga (POL), 2:47:53
2005
Julius Sugut (KEN), 2:13:20
Mulu Seboka (ETH), 2:35:03
2006
Daniel Rono (KEN), 2:12:03
Mulu Seboka (ETH), 2:33:15
2007
John Kelai (KEN), 2:12:27
Yang Fengxia (CHN), 2:36:16
2008
John Kelai (KEN), 2:12:23
Mulu Seboka (ETH), 2:30:04
2009
Kenneth Mugara (KEN), 2:11:51
Kebebush Haile (ETH), 2:34:08
2010
Denis Ndiso (KEN), 2:12:40
Bizunesh Urgesa (ETH), 2:31:09
2011
Girma Assefa (ETH), 2:09:54
Koren Jelela (ETH), 2:26:56
2012
Laban Moiben (KEN), 2:10:48
Netsanet Achamo (ETH), 2:26:12
2013
Jackson Kiprop (UGA), 2:09:32
Valentine Kipketer (KEN), 2:24:33
2014
Evans Rutto (KEN), 2:09:33
Dinknesh Mekash (ETH), 2:28:08
2015
Tesfaye Abera (ETH), 2:09:46
Dinknesh Mekash (ETH), 2:30:00
2016
Gideon Kipketer (KEN), 2:08:35
Shuko Genemo (ETH), 2:27:50
2017
Alphonce Simbu (TAN), 2:09:32
Bornes Kitur (KEN), 2:29:02
2018
Solomon Deksisa (ETH), 2:09:34
Amane Gobena (ETH), 2:25:49
2019
Cosmas Lagat (KEN), 2:09:15
Worknesh Alemu (ETH), 2:25:45
2020
Derara Hurisa (ETH), 2:08:09
Amane Beriso (ETH), 2:24:51
2021 and 2022
Not held (COVID-19)
2023
Hayle Lemi (ETH), 2:07:32 (CR)
Anchialem Haymanot (ETH), 2:24:15 (CR)
2024
Hayle Lemi (ETH), 2:07:50
Abersh Minsewo (ETH), 2:26:06
2025
Berhane Tesfay (ERI), 2:11:44
Joyce Chepkemoi (KEN), 2:24:56
2026
Tadu Abate Deme (ETH), 2:09:55
Yeshi Kalayu Chekole (ETH), 2:25:13
CR = course record. Country codes: ETH Ethiopia, KEN Kenya, RSA South Africa, POL Poland, CHN China, UGA Uganda, TAN Tanzania, ERI Eritrea.
Indian runners at the Mumbai Marathon
The race has a separate Indian elite category with its own prize money, which gives the country’s best distance runners a reason to race at home against a world-class field. In 2026, the top three Indian men and women won ₹5 lakh, ₹4 lakh and ₹3 lakh.
Mumbai has also been a launch pad for Indian Olympians. In 2012, Ram Singh Yadav ran 2:16:59 in Mumbai to qualify for the London Olympics.
The 2026 Indian elite titles went to two surprise winners. Kartik Karkera, an orthopaedic surgeon, won the men’s race in a personal best of 2:19:55, ahead of Anish Thapa (2:20:08) and Pradeep Chaudhary (2:20:49). Sanjivani Jadhav won the women’s race in 2:49:02, just ahead of Nirmaben Thakor (2:49:13) and Sonam (2:49:24).
India’s biggest charity platform
The Mumbai Marathon is not only a race. With United Way Mumbai as its philanthropy partner, it has become India’s largest platform for charity fundraising. Runners raise money for NGOs, and companies enter teams to support causes.
2004: about ₹1.44 crore raised in the first year.
2017: about ₹32.9 crore raised, with more than ₹190 crore raised across the race’s first 14 years.
2024: a record ₹72 crore raised by 268 NGOs.
2026: ₹60.68 crore raised for about 309 NGOs, with 13,580 runners fundraising and around 28,000 donors.
Total: more than ₹500 crore since 2004.
The 2026 Mumbai Marathon: an Ethiopian double
Ethiopia won both elite titles at the 2026 Tata Mumbai Marathon.
The 21st edition, on 18 January 2026, was the biggest yet, with 70,065 participants (65,424 running on the day and 4,641 online). Ethiopia won both elite races, the seventh time in the event’s history that one country has taken both titles.
Men: Tadu Abate Deme (Ethiopia) won in 2:09:55, ahead of Leonard Kiprotich Langat (Kenya, 2:10:10) and Merhawi Kesete (Eritrea, 2:10:22).
Women: Yeshi Kalayu Chekole (Ethiopia) won in 2:25:13, the fifth-fastest women’s winning time in the race’s history. Gojjam Tsegaye Enyew (Ethiopia) was third in 2:28:27.
The elite winners each took home $50,000 (about ₹45 lakh). The 22nd edition will be held on 17 January 2027, again starting from CSMT, with a total prize purse of $389,524.
Fact check: how we verified this history
On a phone, swipe the table sideways to see every column.
Claim
Status
Sources
Started in 2004 by Procam; Standard Chartered until 2017; Tata from 2018 (10-year deal)
Verified
Wikipedia; Procam; BestMediaInfo; Devdiscourse
Course records (Lemi 2:07:32, Haymanot 2:24:15, 2023)
Imagine being unable to walk, undergoing ACL surgery, and then returning to the track to win an international medal less than a year later.
That is exactly what 17-year-old Shourya Ambure has done.
At the Dakar 2026 Youth Olympic Games, Shourya won bronze in the Women’s 100m Hurdles, clocking 13.59 seconds. That’s not just a personal best. It’s also a new U18 National Record.
And she did it after recording another personal best of 13.77 seconds in the semi-finals.
But to understand what makes this medal special, we need to go back a year.
Shourya was already making waves in Indian athletics. She had won the U16 National title in the 60m, clocking 7.60 seconds — a National Record that still stands.
In 2025, she moved to the hurdles and won the U18 National title in the 100m Hurdles with a personal best of 13.86 seconds.
Then came December 2025.
While training at Railway Ground in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, Shourya’s foot reportedly landed in a small hole. She hit a hurdle and suffered an ACL tear in her left knee — her lead leg.
The injury was serious enough to leave her unable to walk. Even basic movement required crutches.
On January 1, 2026, she underwent surgery at Aspetar Hospital in Doha, Qatar. This was the same hospital where Indian long jumper Murali Sreeshankar had undergone knee surgery in 2024.
Sreeshankar also had some advice for the young hurdler: work on your mind as much as your body. His expression for it was, “Biohack your body.”
Shourya’s first major test after surgery came at the Youth Nationals in September 2026, which also served as the selection trials for the Youth Olympics.
She made an impressive start, recording the fastest time across all heats and breaking the meet record.
But the final didn’t go to plan.
Shourya fell during the race and finished last, clocking 19.29 seconds.
The title went to Karnataka’s Nupura Holla, who clocked a personal best of 13.78 seconds.
At that point, Nupura appeared to be the frontrunner for India’s Youth Olympic spot.
But there was a complication.
Although Nupura represented Karnataka, she was not eligible to represent India because she held a US passport and was not an Indian citizen.
Born in Georgia, USA, to Indian parents who were working there, Nupura is an American citizen of Indian origin and holds Overseas Citizen of India status.
But an OCI card does not confer Indian citizenship. And for international representation where Indian nationality is required, OCI status is not enough.
The federation therefore organised another qualifying race at SAI Bengaluru on September 21.
Shourya got another opportunity.
She clocked 13.09 seconds by hand timing, with 13.10 seconds recorded as her official time, and secured her place on the Indian team.
And now, in Dakar, she has delivered.
A bronze medal. Two consecutive personal bests. And a new U18 National Record of 13.59 seconds.
There is another milestone here.
Shourya has become the first Indian woman to win an athletics medal at the Youth Olympic Games.
From ACL surgery and crutches to a national record and an Olympic podium, her comeback has had several twists.
But perhaps the most significant part is this: at just 17, Shourya Ambure has already shown that her story is only beginning.